Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Pre-Chiasmatic, Single Injection of Autologous Blood to Induce Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Rat Model
Published on: June 18, 2021
International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial - ISAT part II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Tim E Darsaut1, Andrew S Jack, Richard S Kerr
1University of Alberta, Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, 2D,1 Mackenzie Health Sciences Center, 8440 - 112 St, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada. tdarsaut@ualberta.ca
The ISAT II trial investigates whether endovascular coiling or surgical clipping offers better outcomes for ruptured brain aneurysm patients not included in the original ISAT study. This large, international trial aims to clarify optimal treatment strategies for subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) favored endovascular coiling over surgical clipping for good-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients with small anterior circulation aneurysms.
- Clinical practice often deviates from ISAT findings, with surgical clipping used for presumed better outcomes or durability, despite a lack of formal validation.
- Uncertainty persists regarding the optimal treatment for many ruptured intracranial aneurysm patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes between endovascular coiling and surgical clipping in a broad population of non-ISAT patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
- To validate or refute the extrapolated superiority of coiling in a wider patient group.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for ruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment decisions.
Main Methods:
- ISAT II is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial comparing coiling versus clipping.
- Inclusion criteria are broad, encompassing patients not eligible for the original ISAT.
- The primary endpoint is poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2) at one year, with secondary endpoints including safety and recurrence rates.
Main Results:
- The study is designed to enroll 1,896 patients across at least 50 international centers.
- A projected 23% poor outcome rate for coiling versus 30% for clipping is hypothesized.
- The trial is estimated to take approximately 12 years to complete, with intention-to-treat analysis.
Conclusions:
- The ISAT II trial will provide crucial data on the comparative effectiveness of coiling and clipping for a wider spectrum of ruptured intracranial aneurysm patients.
- Findings will inform clinical decision-making and potentially refine treatment guidelines for subarachnoid hemorrhage.
- The study addresses the ongoing debate regarding the optimal management strategy for ruptured aneurysms beyond the ISAT cohort.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
