Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Exploring the feasibility of Conjoint Analysis as a tool for prioritizing innovations for implementation
Katherine Farley1, Carl Thompson, Andria Hanbury
1Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, York YO10 5DD, England. katherine.farley@york.ac.uk
Implementation Science : IS
|May 30, 2013
Summary
Prioritizing healthcare innovations is challenging. Conjoint Analysis (CA) effectively captures professional values, identifying "guided self help" as a top priority for postnatal depression interventions.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Innovation
- Implementation Science
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Prioritizing healthcare innovations is crucial due to limited resources.
- Professional values and attitudes significantly influence implementation decisions.
- Capturing these values reliably presents a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an approach for capturing and incorporating professional values into healthcare innovation prioritization.
- To measure healthcare professional priorities for interventions addressing postnatal depression.
Main Methods:
- Conjoint Analysis (CA) was employed in a UK Primary Care Trust.
- Rating-based CA data was collected via questionnaire.
- Data was mapped onto 12 interventions for managing postnatal depression.
Main Results:
- 'Impact on patient care' and 'quality of supporting evidence' were key drivers of priority.
- 'Guided self help' emerged as the top-priority intervention.
- Interventions were grouped into 'psychological therapies' for implementation.
Conclusions:
- Conjoint Analysis is a feasible method for capturing stakeholder utility in innovation prioritization.
- This approach can increase the likelihood of innovation adoption.
- Improving response rates for conjoint surveys is necessary for routine use.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Medium Optimization
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Factorial Design
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Creative Thinking
Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
Divergent thinking is the...
Response Surface Methodology
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

