Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Stimulated Raman Scattering Imaging of Deuterium Incorporation in a Single Bacterium
Published on: February 14, 2022
Susceptibility of enterococci to daptomycin is dependent upon testing methodology
Kendall A Bryant1, Amity L Roberts, Mark E Rupp
1Department of Pathology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984031 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4031, USA.
Abstract:
An increase in daptomycin nonsusceptible enterococci (DNSE) was noted in our institution (8.3% 2008 to 34.5% 2011) using MicroScan methods which may overestimate DNSE prevalence. DNSE (N = 150) from the clinical laboratory (2008-2011) underwent susceptibility testing using broth microdilution (BMD), Etest, Sensititire, MicroScan prompt (MSP), and MicroScan turbidity (MST) with only 20% of isolates confirmed as nonsusceptible. Categorical and essential agreement were highest with MSP and MST, but both missed the majority of resistant isolates (70% and 87% missed). Etest MIC values were statistically higher, more likely to be nonsusceptible, had the lowest very major error rate (37%), and the highest falsely nonsusceptible rate (22%). Sensititre MIC values were not statistically different from BMD, but missed 57% of DNSE. PFGE analysis did not define a clonal outbreak. These findings suggest that MicroScan methods overestimate nonsusceptibility, and the lack of correlation between methods raises questions regarding which method is most effective at confirming nonsusceptibility.
Insights
MicroScan methods may overestimate daptomycin nonsusceptible enterococci (DNSE) prevalence. Further testing is needed to determine the most accurate method for confirming DNSE nonsusceptibility.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- An increasing prevalence of daptomycin nonsusceptible enterococci (DNSE) was observed, potentially due to overestimation by current laboratory methods.
- Enterococci infections are a growing concern, particularly those exhibiting resistance to critical antibiotics like daptomycin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of different antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods for detecting daptomycin nonsusceptibility in enterococci.
- To compare MicroScan (prompt and turbidity), Etest, and Sensititre methods against broth microdilution (BMD) for DNSE detection.
Main Methods:
- 150 clinical isolates of enterococci were tested for daptomycin susceptibility using BMD, Etest, Sensititre, MicroScan prompt (MSP), and MicroScan turbidity (MST).
- Categorical and essential agreement were assessed, along with error rates (very major, major, minor).
- Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to investigate potential clonal outbreaks.
Main Results:
- Only 20% of isolates initially identified as DNSE by MicroScan were confirmed nonsusceptible by BMD.
- MSP and MST showed high categorical agreement but missed a majority of resistant isolates (70% and 87%, respectively).
- Etest yielded higher MICs, with a high rate of falsely nonsusceptible results (22%) and a low very major error rate (37%). Sensititre missed 57% of DNSE.
Conclusions:
- MicroScan methods likely overestimate DNSE prevalence.
- Significant discrepancies between AST methods highlight challenges in accurately confirming daptomycin nonsusceptibility.
- Further research is required to establish a gold standard for DNSE susceptibility testing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Estimation of k and VD of Aminoglycosides
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Differential Staining Technique

