Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Community-based, supervised, group exercise for people living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a cohort study.

Age and ageing·2026
Same author

'I Want Everyone to Have It, and Everyone to Be on It': A Feasibility Study of the Transforming Long Covid Intervention.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

Acute metabolic and molecular responses to sprint interval versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise in healthy young men.

American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

BRAIN-Diabetes: a randomised trial to test the feasibility of an adapted FINGER multidomain intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes living in rural border regions of Ireland.

European journal of ageing·2025
Same author

The Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Oesophagogastric Cancer Surgery: Combined Data from Four Prospective Clinical Trials Performed Across the UK and Ireland.

Cancers·2025
Same author

The effect of a pre-operative and post-operative exercise programme versus standard care on physical fitness of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer undergoing neoadjuvant treatment prior to surgery (the PERIOP-OG trial): a randomized controlled trial.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2024
Same journal

Concussion Symptom Resolution Expectations and Subsequent Development of Persisting Symptoms After Adolescent Concussion.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same journal

Loading Patterns During Landing Tasks in Active-Duty Special Operations Forces Personnel.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same journal

Effects of an 8-Week Core Training Program on Lumbopelvic-Hip Muscle Function and Pitching Biomechanics in Adolescent Pitchers.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same journal

Development of a Pragmatic Prediction Model for Bone Stress Injuries in First-Year US Military Academy Cadets.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same journal

A Graft Source Comparison of Changes in Walking Gait After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Force-Sensing Insoles.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same journal

Strengthening Peer Review: Strategic Approaches for Authors, Reviewers, Editors, Journals, and Academic Institutions.

Journal of athletic training·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?

Jacob Resch1, Aoife Driscoll, Noel McCaffrey

  • 1University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19259, 113 Maverick Activities Center, Arlington, TX 76102, USA. resch@uta.edu

Journal of Athletic Training
|June 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Test-retest reliability for the ImPACT computerized neuropsychological test battery was variable, with visual motor speed and reaction time showing greater consistency. Findings suggest a multifaceted approach for concussion assessment is optimal.

More Related Videos

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
08:40

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity

Published on: June 12, 2019

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sports Medicine
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Computerized neuropsychological testing is widely used for concussion assessment and management.
  • Limited psychometric evidence exists for the test-retest reliability of these widely used computerized tests.
  • Enhanced reliability data is crucial for optimizing clinical decision-making following concussion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT computerized neuropsychological test battery.
  • To assess reliability across two clinically relevant time intervals.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study was conducted across two research laboratories.
  • Participants completed the ImPACT test battery at sequential time points (1-week or 45/50-day intervals).
  • Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and repeated-measures ANOVA were used to analyze ImPACT and Green Word Memory Test (WMT) data.

Main Results:

  • Test-retest reliability (ICC values) for ImPACT composite scores varied, ranging from 0.26 to 0.88.
  • Visual motor speed and reaction time demonstrated higher reliability compared to verbal and visual memory.
  • A significant percentage of healthy participants were misclassified as impaired at follow-up time points.

Conclusions:

  • The test-retest reliability of ImPACT metrics is variable.
  • Visual motor speed and reaction time subtests show better reliability than memory-related subtests.
  • A comprehensive concussion assessment should integrate clinical exams, symptom reports, cognitive testing, and balance measures.