Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The obstetric forceps--are we using the appropriate tools?

B M Hibbard1, D M McKenna

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff.

British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel quantitative immunoassay system for p53 using antibodies selected for optimum designation of p53 status.

Journal of clinical pathology·1997
Same author

Cell adhesion molecules in bladder cancer: soluble serum E-cadherin correlates with predictors of recurrence.

British journal of cancer·1996
Same author

Maternal mortality in Europe.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·1994
Same author

A paramedic based emergency domiciliary obstetric service: the South Glamorgan experience.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1993
Same author

Folates and fetal development.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1993
Same author

A difficult intubation--fatal respiratory arrest secondary to an oral epulis.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·1992
Same journal

Livial: an economic appraisal.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Livial: a review of clinical studies.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2000
Same journal

Place of birth and shoulder dystocia.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

The value of the negative predictive values.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Splenectomy during pregnancy: an option in treatment of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
Same journal

Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough?

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1999
See all related articles

Measurements of obstetric forceps revealed significant deviations from original designs and inconsistencies among instruments, even from the same manufacturer. This highlights a critical need to reassess current forceps usage and dimensions in obstetric units for improved patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Device Engineering
  • Surgical Instrument Analysis

Background:

  • Obstetric forceps are critical tools in modern obstetrics.
  • Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of these instruments is vital for safe delivery practices.
  • Previous assessments of instrument standardization have not comprehensively addressed current clinical variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the dimensional accuracy and consistency of commonly used obstetric forceps against manufacturer standards.
  • To determine if current obstetric forceps designs are suitable for contemporary obstetric practice.
  • To identify variations in forceps dimensions that could impact clinical efficacy and patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 166 pairs of obstetric forceps across three types were measured in two major obstetric units.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements included linear dimensions of blades, shanks, handles, tip distances, maximum blade separation, and cephalic curve radius.
  • Comparison was made against manufacturers' master instruments and original drawings.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant discrepancies were found between measured forceps and original specifications.
    • Wide variations in dimensions were observed even among instruments of the same type and manufacturer.
    • In some instances, forceps blades were not correctly paired in sterile supply departments, indicating potential handling errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Current obstetric forceps in clinical use often deviate significantly from their intended designs.
    • There is a pressing need for a critical reappraisal of obstetric forceps currently employed in clinical settings.
    • Recommendations include reconsidering forceps types and verifying the dimensions of individual instrument pairs to ensure suitability and safety.