Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bleeding Risk With Apixaban Versus Rivaroxaban: A Reference Trial Emulation Predicting the Results of COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF Using US Health Care Claims.

Circulation. Population health and outcomes·2026
Same author

Using real-world data to predict findings of an ongoing phase IV trial: glycemic control of semaglutide versus standard of care.

BMJ open diabetes research & care·2025
Same author

Evidence Generation for Drugs and Biological Products isn't Magic or Myth.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

Modernizing Research and Evidence Consensus Definitions: A Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Collaboration.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Unraveling the genetics of gulf war illness in diverse participants enrolled in the million veteran program.

Human molecular genetics·2025
Same author

US Food and Drug Administration's Advancing Real-World Evidence Program: Initial Experience.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Study design and "evidence" in patient-oriented research.

John Concato1

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. john.concato@yale.edu

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
|June 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating patient-oriented research requires a balanced approach. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies have strengths and limitations that must be considered for accurate evidence assessment.

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Clinical trial design
  • Observational study design

Background:

  • Patient-oriented research utilizes various study designs, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (e.g., cohort, case-control).
  • A recent emphasis on evidence-based medicine has promoted a hierarchy favoring RCTs as the gold standard, potentially overlooking the value of other designs.
  • Presumptions about study quality based solely on design category can be unscientific, neglecting the inherent strengths and limitations of each approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a more balanced evaluation of evidence in patient-oriented research.
  • To highlight the strengths and limitations of both randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
  • To promote a medicine-based evidence approach considering both internal validity and external generalizability.

Main Methods:

  • Review and discussion of methodological designs in patient-oriented research.
  • Analysis of the strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
  • Examination of case examples from general medical and pulmonary/critical care literature.

Main Results:

  • Rigid hierarchies of study designs are a recent development and may not be scientifically sound.
  • Both randomized trials and observational studies have unique strengths and weaknesses that influence their validity and generalizability.
  • A balanced assessment requires considering the intersection of clinical and methodological issues.

Conclusions:

  • A balanced approach to evaluating evidence is warranted, considering both internal validity and external generalizability.
  • The strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials and observational studies should be simultaneously considered.
  • A medicine-based evidence approach is crucial for accurately assessing cause-effect associations in patient-oriented research.