Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Development of Analytical Methods01:21

Development of Analytical Methods

An analytical methodology can be divided into four sequential steps: technique, method, procedure, and protocol. A technique is a scientific principle that rationalizes a specific phenomenon through chemical measurements. Adapting a technique for analyzing a sample of interest is termed a method. The procedure outlines the directions for performing the analysis via an analytical method. The protocol is the detailed guidelines on the procedure, which should be strictly followed to obtain the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TEMSET-24K: Densely Annotated Dataset for Indexing Multipart Endoscopic Videos using Surgical Timeline Segmentation.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Complex Salvage Lower Lip Reconstruction Using Gracilis Free Flap.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2025
Same author

In-Office vs Operating Room Time to Treatment of Oropharyngeal Biopsies.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2024
Same author

COVID-19 and business failures: The paradoxes of experience, scale, and scope for theory and practice.

European management journal·2024
Same author

Copernicus for urban resilience in Europe.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Selective Thermal and Photocatalytic Decomposition of Aqueous Hydrazine to Produce H<sub>2</sub> over Ag-Modified TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanomaterial.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Evaluating a collaborative IT based research and development project.

Zaheer Khan1, David Ludlow, Santiago Caceres

  • 1University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, BS16 1QY, Bristol, UK. Zaheer2.Khan@uwe.ac.uk

Evaluation and Program Planning
|June 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating large collaborative research projects like HUMBOLDT presents challenges due to diverse stakeholders and objectives. This study details a specific user evaluation methodology, offering insights for future IT research and development initiatives.

Keywords:
Collaborative research project evaluationIntegrated project research and developmentParticipatory evaluation methodologyQuestionnaire and user-based evaluationUser and technical evaluation

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Information Technology
  • Collaborative Research
  • Project Management

Background:

  • Evaluating large-scale, international IT research and development projects is complex.
  • Challenges include diverse stakeholder backgrounds, conflicting requirements, and varied objectives.
  • The HUMBOLDT project, a 54-month initiative with 27 partners from 14 European countries, faced these complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a specific user evaluation methodology developed for the HUMBOLDT project.
  • To analyze the benefits and drawbacks of this evaluation methodology.
  • To provide insights applicable to other large-scale collaborative research projects.

Main Methods:

  • Development and implementation of a tailored evaluation methodology for the HUMBOLDT Framework.
  • User evaluation of the HUMBOLDT Framework across nine application scenarios.
  • In-depth analysis of the evaluation process and results.

Main Results:

  • The applied methodology successfully evaluated the HUMBOLDT project's outcomes.
  • The evaluation revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen methodology.
  • Results offer practical lessons for managing and assessing similar collaborative R&D efforts.

Conclusions:

  • A defined evaluation methodology is crucial for assessing complex, international IT research projects.
  • The HUMBOLDT project's experience provides a valuable case study for methodology refinement.
  • Findings can inform best practices in collaborative research evaluation across various domains.