Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural mechanisms of attention, not expectation, govern spatial selection by probabilistic cueing.

NeuroImage·2025
Same author

Complex three-dimensional rearing environments amplify compensatory plasticity following early blindness.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Reward expectation yields distinct effects on sensory processing and decision making in the human brain.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

Reward history guides focal attention in whisker somatosensory cortex.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Distinct neural bases of subcomponents of the attentional blink.

eLife·2025
Same author

The right posterior parietal cortex mediates spatial reorienting of attentional choice bias.

Nature communications·2024
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Spatial probability dynamically modulates visual target detection in chickens.

Devarajan Sridharan1, Deepa L Ramamurthy, Eric I Knudsen

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. dsridhar@stanford.edu

Plos One
|June 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chickens flexibly adjust visual attention based on target probability, similar to primates. This demonstrates that dynamic sensory modulation is not unique to primates and occurs in birds.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Visualization of Tangential Cell Migration in the Developing Chick Optic Tectum
08:28

Visualization of Tangential Cell Migration in the Developing Chick Optic Tectum

Published on: October 24, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Visualization of Tangential Cell Migration in the Developing Chick Optic Tectum
08:28

Visualization of Tangential Cell Migration in the Developing Chick Optic Tectum

Published on: October 24, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Animal Behavior
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Organisms need to efficiently locate relevant sensory information for survival.
  • Primates use spatial regularities to improve target detection.
  • The extent to which non-primate species exhibit flexible attention is largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if chickens (Gallus domesticus) can flexibly modify their visual detection performance based on stimulus probability.
  • To determine if chickens exhibit attentional modulation similar to primates.

Main Methods:

  • Chickens were trained on a Go/NoGo task to detect visual targets.
  • Target presentation probability was manipulated across visual field quadrants.
  • Detection performance was assessed under varying probability conditions and recent performance history.

Main Results:

  • Chickens showed a bias for lower visual field targets when probabilities were equal.
  • Increasing upper visual field target probability improved detection performance there.
  • Detection performance dynamically changed based on recent target history.

Conclusions:

  • Chickens demonstrate flexible, dynamic visual attention modulation based on spatial probabilities.
  • This ability is not exclusive to primates, suggesting a broader evolutionary basis.
  • Recent performance history also influences attentional modulation in chickens.