Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Assaying Protein Kinase Activity with Radiolabeled ATP
Published on: May 26, 2017
MEK1 and MEK2 differentially control the duration and amplitude of the ERK cascade response
Pawel Kocieniewski1, Tomasz Lipniacki
1Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract:
The Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is one of the most studied and important signal transduction pathways. However, existing models largely ignore the existence of isoforms of the constituent kinases and their interactions. Here, we propose a model of the ERK cascade that includes heretofore neglected differences between isoforms of MEK. In particular, MEK1 is subject to a negative feedback from activated ERK, which is further conferred to MEK2 via hetero-dimerization. Specifically, ERK phosphorylates MEK1 at the residue Thr292, hypothetically creating an additional phosphatase binding site, accelerating MEK1 and MEK2 dephosphorylation. We incorporated these recently discovered interactions into a mathematical model of the ERK cascade that reproduces the experimental results of Catalanotti et al (2009 Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16 294-303) and Kamioka et al (2010 J. Biol. Chem. 285 33540-8). Furthermore, the model allows for predictions regarding the differences in the catalytic activity and function of the MEK isoforms. We propose that the MEK1/MEK2 ratio regulates the duration of the response, which increases with the level of MEK2 and decreases with the level of MEK1. In turn, the amplitude of the response is controlled by the total amount of the two isoforms. We confirm the proposed model structure performing a random parameter sampling, which led us to the conclusion that the sampled parameters, selected to properly reproduce wild-type (WT) cell behavior, to allow for qualitative reproduction of differences in behavior WT cells and cell mutants studied experimentally.
Insights
This study models the ERK pathway, incorporating MEK1 and MEK2 isoform differences. The MEK1/MEK2 ratio regulates response duration, while total MEK levels control amplitude, offering new insights into signal transduction.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Systems Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is a critical signal transduction pathway.
- Existing models often overlook the distinct roles and interactions of kinase isoforms, particularly MEK1 and MEK2.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a mathematical model of the ERK cascade that accounts for isoform-specific differences in MEK1 and MEK2.
- To investigate the impact of MEK isoform interactions, including negative feedback and hetero-dimerization, on pathway dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Incorporation of recently discovered interactions, such as ERK-mediated phosphorylation of MEK1 at Thr292, into a mathematical model.
- Validation of the model against experimental data from Catalanotti et al. and Kamioka et al.
- Utilizing random parameter sampling to confirm model structure and its ability to reproduce wild-type and mutant cell behaviors.
Main Results:
- The model successfully reproduces experimental results, demonstrating the importance of isoform-specific dynamics.
- Predictions suggest that the MEK1/MEK2 ratio dictates response duration, with higher MEK2 increasing duration and higher MEK1 decreasing it.
- The total amount of MEK isoforms controls the amplitude of the cellular response.
Conclusions:
- The proposed model provides a more accurate representation of the ERK cascade by including MEK isoform differences.
- The MEK1/MEK2 ratio and total MEK levels are key regulators of ERK pathway output.
- This work highlights the functional significance of isoform diversity in signal transduction pathways.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
MAPK Signaling Cascades
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Master Transcription Regulators
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle

