Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein
Published on: September 27, 2024
Is it safe to divide and ligate the left innominate vein in complex cardiothoracic surgeries?
Arthur McPhee1, Kasra Shaikhrezai, Geoffrey Berg
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
Insights
Dividing the left innominate vein (LIV) during aortic arch surgery is safe for selected patients. Collateral pathways ensure venous drainage, with potential for temporary limb swelling that typically resolves with conservative management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiac Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Access during aortic arch surgery can be challenging.
- Division of the left innominate vein (LIV) is a potential strategy to improve surgical exposure.
- The safety and implications of LIV division require careful evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and outcomes of dividing the left innominate vein (LIV) in aortic arch surgery.
- To review the best available evidence on LIV division and its impact on venous drainage and complications.
Main Methods:
- A structured best evidence topic review was conducted.
- 228 relevant papers were identified, with nine selected for detailed analysis.
- Data on patient groups, study types, outcomes, and results were tabulated.
Main Results:
- Following LIV division, venous drainage relies on collateral systems (e.g., azygous, internal mammary veins).
- Potential complications include left upper limb swelling and neurological symptoms.
- Studies involving LIV division/ligation in aortic arch surgery and superior vena cava resection showed no significant long-term adverse events in most cases.
Conclusions:
- Division of the left innominate vein (LIV) is considered safe in selected patients and specific surgical scenarios.
- While initial symptoms of central vein obstruction may occur, they tend to decrease as collateral pathways develop.
- Reconstruction of the LIV is generally not associated with favorable patency outcomes.
Abstract:
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether it is safe to divide the left innominate vein (LIV) in aortic arch surgery to improve access. Altogether, 228 relevant papers were found using the reported search, of which nine represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Following LIV division, the venous drainage takes place via multiple collateral systems such as the azygous/hemiazygous, the internal mammary veins, the lateral thoracic and superficial thoracoabdominal veins, vertebral venous plexus as well as the transverse sinus. The possible complications are mainly left upper limb swelling and neurological symptoms. In one case series of 14 patients, the LIV was divided and ligated to facilitate the exposure for aortic arch surgery. More than 2-year follow-up did not reveal upper limb oedema or neurological symptoms. In two cohorts of 52 patients, the LIV was ligated prior to the superior vena cava (SVC) resection for malignancy. During the mid-term follow-up, no neurological or upper limb symptoms were reported. Although in two studies with 72 and 70 patients undergoing SVC resection it was not specified how many of them had LIV ligation, no relevant complications were reported. In a report, LIV occlusion was observed in 4 patients undergoing left internal jagular vein catheterization for haemodialysis. The reported symptom was left arm swelling with no neurological problems. In a cohort of 18 patients undergoing SVC resection for malignancy and major vein reconstruction, 7 patients underwent ligation of the LIV with no neurological symptoms. It was also concluded that reconstruction of the LIV is not consistent with favourable patency. In a case series of 10 patients with central venous obstruction, collateral pathways to conduct efficient venous drainage were mapped. We conclude that division of the LIV is safe in selected patients and operations. Patients will initially have symptoms of central vein obstruction, but these will decrease with conservative management as collaterals form.

