Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Is chlorthalidone better than hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular events in hypertensives?
George C Roush1, Venkata Buddharaju, Michael E Ernst
1St Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, Connecticut 06606, USA. groush@gcr0.com
Insights
Chlorthalidone (CTDN) is more effective than hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in reducing cardiovascular events (CVEs). Evidence shows CTDN offers superior antihypertensive potency and better outcomes for heart failure and overall CVE reduction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a widely prescribed diuretic.
- Chlorthalidone (CTDN) is less commonly prescribed, despite potential benefits.
- Direct comparative trials for cardiovascular event reduction between HCTZ and CTDN are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of chlorthalidone (CTDN) versus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in reducing cardiovascular events (CVEs).
- To evaluate the comparative antihypertensive potency and effects on cardiovascular health outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of head-to-head trials comparing CTDN and HCTZ.
- Review of observational cohort studies assessing CTDN versus HCTZ.
- Examination of network meta-analyses of randomized trials involving HCTZ and CTDN.
Main Results:
- CTDN demonstrates superior antihypertensive potency, especially overnight, due to its longer duration of action compared to HCTZ.
- Observational data indicate CTDN is associated with lower left ventricular hypertrophy than HCTZ.
- Network meta-analyses reveal CTDN significantly reduces congestive heart failure and all CVEs compared to HCTZ, with a 21% risk reduction (95% CI 12-28).
- CTDN's benefit in CVE reduction is evident even when office systolic blood pressure reduction is similar to HCTZ.
Conclusions:
- Both direct and indirect evidence support CTDN's superiority over HCTZ in reducing cardiovascular events.
- The findings align with updated hypertension management guidelines favoring CTDN.
- CTDN represents a more effective therapeutic option for hypertension management concerning cardiovascular risk reduction.
Purpose Of Review:
Hydrochlorthiazide (HCTZ) is the tenth most commonly prescribed drug in recent data. Although no head-to-head trials compare HCTZ with the uncommonly prescribed chlorthalidone (CTDN) in reducing cardiovascular events (CVEs), numerous other data are available.
Recent Findings:
Head-to-head trials have shown CTDN's superiority in antihypertensive potency, particularly during the critical nighttime period (SBP difference 7.1 mmHg), due to the differences in duration of action (16-24 h for HCTZ versus 48-72 h for CTDN). In an observational cohort study, compared with HCTZ, CTDN was associated with lower left ventricular hypertrophy. In another observational cohort analysis (n = 12,866), the percentage risk reduction in CVEs from CTDN versus HCTZ was 21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8-32], P = 0.002. In network meta-analyses of randomized trials (n = 50,946), CTDN was superior to HCTZ in reducing congestive heart failure and in reducing all CVEs: percentage risk reduction 21 (95% CI 12-28), P < 0.0001. A statistically significant reduction in CVEs by CTDN versus HCTZ persisted even when reduction in office SBP produced by the two diuretics was identical, further strengthening the case for CTDN.
Summary:
Direct and indirect evidence demonstrates that CTDN is superior to HCTZ in reducing CVEs and is congruent with the recent changes in the guidelines for hypertension management.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Thiazide-Class Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers