Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rating the burn scar.

T Sullivan1, J Smith, J Kermode

  • 1Vancouver General Hospital Burn Unit, BC, Canada.

The Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute choke zone effects: Lessons from radioactive and fluorescent microspheres in a pig model muscle flap.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)·2015
Same author

Robin sequence: clearing nosologic confusion.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2009
Same author

Vascular resistance in human muscle flaps.

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Pediatric hand fractures: a review.

Pediatric emergency care·2001
Same author

Lipoma of the cleft soft palate: a case report of a rare congenital anomaly.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2000
Same author

Pathologic quiz case 2. Cherubism.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·1996
Same journal

Efficacy of a short-term, intensive social skills training program for burned adolescents.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
Same journal

Celebrating progress in psychosocial rehabilitation: empirically validating the efficacy of social skills training and body image assessment for burn survivors.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
Same journal

Axillary burns: extended grafting and early splinting prevents contractures.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
Same journal

Impact of an inpatient rehabilitation facility on functional outcome and length of stay of burn survivors.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
Same journal

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and functional outcomes after a new approach to axillary burns.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
Same journal

Patients with epilepsy: a high-risk population prone to severe burns as a consequence of seizures while showering.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·2005
See all related articles

A new burn scar assessment tool provides objective evaluation of healing, cosmetic appearance, and function. This method ensures reliable comparison of burn scars and treatment outcomes across different observers and institutions.

Area of Science:

  • Reconstructive surgery
  • Burn scar assessment
  • Rehabilitation medicine

Background:

  • Current burn scar assessment lacks objectivity and universality.
  • Standardized methods are crucial for comparing treatment outcomes and facilitating multi-center research.
  • Existing literature lacks a universally accepted, objective scar evaluation tool.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a reliable, objective, and universal method for assessing burn scars.
  • To establish a descriptive terminology for comparing burn scars and treatment results.
  • To create a tool applicable within and between burn centers.

Main Methods:

  • A novel burn scar assessment tool was devised, focusing on physical parameters.
  • Parameters include pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and scar height, each scored independently.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Seventy-three patients were assessed by three occupational therapists, with findings analyzed for interrater reliability using Cohen's kappa statistic.

    • Main Results:

    • The assessment tool demonstrated statistically significant interrater reliability, with Cohen's kappa around 0.5 +/- 0.1 for each parameter.
    • Reliability improved over time, indicating a learning effect or increased observer confidence.
    • The devised method allows for objective comparison of burn scars by different observers.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed burn scar assessment tool is a valuable instrument for objective evaluation.
    • It facilitates consistent and reliable comparisons of burn scars and treatment efficacy.
    • This method supports standardized data collection in burn care research and clinical practice.