Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Learning each other's ropes: negotiating interdisciplinary authenticity
Edward F Redish1, Todd J Cooke
1Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4111, USA. sh@umd.edu
Abstract:
A common feature of the recent calls for reform of the undergraduate biology curriculum has been for better coordination between biology and the courses from the allied disciplines of mathematics, chemistry, and physics. Physics has lagged behind math and chemistry in creating new, biologically oriented curricula, although much activity is now taking place, and significant progress is being made. In this essay, we consider a case study: a multiyear conversation between a physicist interested in adapting his physics course for biologists (E.F.R.) and a biologist interested in including more physics in his biology course (T.J.C.). These extended discussions have led us both to a deeper understanding of each other's discipline and to significant changes in the way we each think about and present our classes. We discuss two examples in detail: the creation of a physics problem on fluid flow for a biology class and the creation of a biologically authentic physics problem on scaling and dimensional analysis. In each case, we see differences in how the two disciplines frame and see value in the tasks. We conclude with some generalizations about how biology and physics look at the world differently that help us navigate the minefield of counterproductive stereotypical responses.
Related Concept Videos
Role-Based Identity
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Processes of Self-Presentation
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
