Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

An alkyl-swap platform for late-stage modification of secondary N-methylamines.

Nature chemistry·2026
Same author

Distinct mechanisms of contextual modulation for dynamic natural scenes in motion- and scene-selective cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Cation Sampling Enables Regiodivergent Distal Functionalization of Ketones.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Clinical development of tacrolimus-resistant regulatory T cells to enable simultaneous immunosuppression and immune regulation.

Molecular therapy. Advances·2026
Same author

Dynamic neural representations of scene beauty are relatively unaffected by stimulus timing and task.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

A Matter of Parameters: Tailored Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Enhances Cortico-Thalamo-Cortical Circuit Resonance.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Proactive visual and motor prioritization differentially scale with cue reliability.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Yao et al., "Estrogen Regulates Bcl-w and Bim Expression: Role in Protection against β-Amyloid Peptide-Induced Neuronal Death".

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Erratum: L'Episcopo et al., "Plasticity of Subventricular Zone Neuroprogenitors in MPTP (1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine) Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease Involves Cross Talk between Inflammatory and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathways: Functional Consequences for Neuroprotection and Repair".

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Representations of subsecond duration-based timing by complex spike synchrony in cerebellar Purkinje neurons.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The extended language network: Language-responsive brain areas whose contributions to language remain to be discovered.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects.

Gyula Kovács1, Daniel Kaiser, Dzmitry A Kaliukhovich

  • 1Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany. gyula.kovacs@uni-jena.de

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|June 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Repetition suppression (RS) in the human brain for object stimuli is not modulated by repetition probability. This suggests that perceptual expectation effects differ across visual categories like faces versus objects.

More Related Videos

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Unilateral Hemisphere of Rat Brain
05:47

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Unilateral Hemisphere of Rat Brain

Published on: October 22, 2016

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Unilateral Hemisphere of Rat Brain
05:47

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Unilateral Hemisphere of Rat Brain

Published on: October 22, 2016

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis
10:33

Correlating Behavioral Responses to fMRI Signals from Human Prefrontal Cortex: Examining Cognitive Processes Using Task Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest perceptual expectations influence repetition suppression (RS) for faces.
  • However, macaque studies using objects found no modulation of neural responses by repetition probability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if stimulus repetition probability affects fMRI repetition suppression for nonface object stimuli in humans.
  • To compare human findings with previous macaque studies.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects viewed object stimuli in either repetition trials (two identical objects) or alternation trials (two different objects).
  • Trials were presented in blocks with either 75% repetition trials (repetition blocks) or 25% repetition trials (alternation blocks).
  • fMRI measured brain activity in object-sensitive and face-sensitive visual areas.

Main Results:

  • Strong repetition suppression (RS) was observed in object-sensitive lateral occipital cortex and face-sensitive areas for object stimuli.
  • No significant difference in the magnitude of RS was found between repetition blocks and alternation blocks.
  • This indicates repetition probability does not modulate RS for nonface objects in humans.

Conclusions:

  • Repetition suppression for nonface visual objects in humans is not modulated by stimulus repetition probability.
  • These findings align with macaque electrophysiology studies.
  • Perceptual expectation effects appear to vary across different visual stimulus categories (e.g., faces vs. objects).