Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A formula for estimating pretest probability: evaluation and clinical application.

N M Gayed1, D E Kern

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Francis Scott Key Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Innovations in education and clinical practice.

Journal of general internal medicine·2007
Same author

Job turnover and its correlates among residency program directors in internal medicine: a three-year cohort study.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

Personal growth in medical faculty: a qualitative study.

The Western journal of medicine·2001
Same author

A job-satisfaction measure for internal medicine residency program directors.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1999
Same author

Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.

The New England journal of medicine·1998
Same author

Relation of low-severity violence to women's health.

Journal of general internal medicine·1998
Same journal

Impact of Health Insurance Coverage on Diabetes Care Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Physician Advocacy Engagement: A Scoping Review and Proposal of an Assessment Tool.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Relative Burden of Social Determinants of Health on Diverse Populations of Health Resources and Services Administration Health Centers.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Addressing Moral Distress Among Gender-Affirming Healthcare Professionals.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Trainee-Led Patient Education to Increase Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Scholarly Outcomes of a Small Projects Grant Program.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a new formula to estimate disease prevalence using diagnostic test results and their accuracy. The formula accurately estimated myocardial infarction prevalence without a gold standard test.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Accurate disease prevalence estimation is crucial for interpreting diagnostic test results.
  • Traditional methods often rely on invasive or impractical gold standard tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel formula for estimating disease prevalence.
  • To assess the formula's utility in clinical settings without a gold standard test.

Main Methods:

  • A formula was developed to estimate prevalence using abnormal test results, sensitivity, and specificity.
  • The formula was applied to estimate myocardial infarction prevalence in chest pain patients.
  • Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate error sources.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The formula estimated myocardial infarction prevalence at 30%, closely matching the true prevalence of 25%.
  • Estimated prevalence errors were inversely related to test sensitivity and specificity.
  • Errors were positively related to discrepancies in assumed test accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The developed formula provides a practical method for estimating disease prevalence.
  • This approach can improve the utilization of laboratory tests in clinical practice.
  • It offers an alternative to gold standard testing for prevalence estimation.