Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

08:30
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
Published on: February 15, 2015
Optimal behaviour can violate the principle of regularity
1Modelling Animal Decisions Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK. pete.trimmer@gmail.com
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|June 7, 2013
Summary
Animals may appear irrational when making choices, but optimal strategies can explain these decisions. State-dependent behavior models show that violating regularity is sometimes adaptive, especially with non-persistent options.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral ecology
- Cognitive psychology
- Decision economics
Background:
- Understanding decision-making is central to behavioral ecology, psychology, and economics.
- Utility theory's regularity axiom posits stable preferences regardless of additional options.
- Empirical evidence shows animals violate regularity, often deemed irrational due to lack of theoretical explanation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To theoretically explain why animals violate the regularity axiom in decision-making.
- To demonstrate that choices violating regularity can be optimal under state-dependent behavior models.
- To investigate the influence of option persistence on the conditions for regularity violation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized state-dependent behavior models to simulate decision-making processes.
- Analyzed conditions under which optimal strategies lead to violations of the regularity axiom.
- Examined the impact of non-persistent options on the frequency and scope of regularity violations.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that optimal behavioral strategies can lead to choices violating the regularity axiom.
- Identified that the conditions favoring regularity violations expand when options are not always persistent.
- Showed that even unchosen options can influence decisions, challenging standard utility theory.
Conclusions:
- Violations of the regularity axiom in animal choices can be theoretically explained as optimal, state-dependent behaviors.
- The dynamic nature of options (persistence) significantly impacts the likelihood of regularity violations.
- Standard utility theory, relying on axioms like regularity, may be insufficient to capture the complexity of real-world decision-making, particularly in ecological contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Deviation from Ideal Behaviour
Real gases do not perfectly obey the ideal gas laws, especially at high pressures and low temperatures or when they are about to condense to a liquid. These deviations occur due to intermolecular forces between gas molecules. Repulsive forces aid expansion and are significant when molecules are very close together, typically at high pressure. Attractive forces assist compression and have a longer range, being effective over several molecular diameters. They become significant when molecules are...
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

