Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

In Vivo Wireless Optogenetic Control of Skilled Motor Behavior
Published on: November 22, 2021
Optimization and variability of motor behavior in multifinger tasks: what variables does the brain use?
Joel R Martin1, Alexander V Terekhov, Mark L Latash
1Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Researchers explored how the brain controls finger movements, comparing individual finger forces to central commands. Central commands appear to stabilize performance, while both methods aid in optimizing force sharing for better neural control.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Neural control of movement can be conceptualized using different elemental variables.
- Key elemental variables for finger pressing tasks include individual finger forces and central motor commands (finger modes).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine which set of elemental variables (finger forces vs. central commands) is utilized for optimizing finger force sharing.
- To identify which set of elemental variables is employed for stabilizing motor performance during finger pressing tasks.
Main Methods:
- Employed analytical inverse optimization (ANIO) to assess optimization aspects.
- Utilized uncontrolled manifold (UCM) analysis to evaluate performance stabilization.
- Compared the efficacy of individual finger forces and central commands using these techniques.
Main Results:
- UCM analysis indicated that central commands are favored for performance stabilization.
- ANIO demonstrated comparable effectiveness for both finger forces and central commands in optimization.
- Suggests a neural control scheme where a cost function based on finger forces is transformed into one optimized in the space of central commands.
Conclusions:
- Central commands are likely used by the central nervous system (CNS) for stabilizing finger pressing tasks.
- The CNS may optimize performance by substituting a finger-force-based cost function with a more computationally convenient central-command-based one for feedforward control.
More Related Videos
10:10Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: January 30, 2026
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014