Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall. The coating...
Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases01:17

Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases

Gas chromatography (GC) relies on stationary phases to separate and analyze components in a sample. There are two main types of stationary phases: liquid and solid. Liquid stationary phases are non-volatile, thermally stable, and chemically inert liquids coated onto the column. Solid stationary phases are particles of adsorbent material, such as silica gel or molecular sieves.
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Absolute Bioavailability of Oxaliplatin After Intraperitoneal Administration by Electrostatic Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC): Systemic Pharmacokinetics of the CRC-PIPAC-II Trial.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

MASSISTANT: A deep learning model for De Novo molecular structure prediction from EI‑MS spectra via SELFIES encoding.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Oxaliplatin After Intraperitoneal Administration by Electrostatic Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC) in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases in the CRC-PIPAC Trial.

Annals of surgical oncology·2020
Same author

Column Selection and Optimization for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography: A Review.

Critical reviews in analytical chemistry·2020
Same author

Two metrics for measuring orthogonality for two-dimensional chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2018
Same author

Enhancing detectability of anabolic-steroid residues in bovine urine by actively modulated online comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography - high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Analytica chimica acta·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

Tunable secondary dimension selectivity in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.

John Mommers1, Giulia Pluimakers, Jeroen Knooren

  • 1DSM Resolve, P.O. Box 18, 6160 MD Geleen, The Netherlands. john.mommers@dsm.com

Journal of Chromatography. A
|June 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Two tunable two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) setups offer enhanced separation and qualitative analysis by adjusting column selectivity. These methods effectively resolve coeluting aroma compounds in complex samples like coffee headspace.

More Related Videos

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

Measurement of H2S in Crude Oil and Crude Oil Headspace Using Multidimensional Gas Chromatography, Deans Switching and Sulfur-selective Detection
08:37

Measurement of H2S in Crude Oil and Crude Oil Headspace Using Multidimensional Gas Chromatography, Deans Switching and Sulfur-selective Detection

Published on: December 10, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

Measurement of H2S in Crude Oil and Crude Oil Headspace Using Multidimensional Gas Chromatography, Deans Switching and Sulfur-selective Detection
08:37

Measurement of H2S in Crude Oil and Crude Oil Headspace Using Multidimensional Gas Chromatography, Deans Switching and Sulfur-selective Detection

Published on: December 10, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography

Background:

  • Two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is a powerful separation technique.
  • Optimizing selectivity in the second dimension is crucial for resolving complex mixtures.
  • Existing GC×GC methods may lack flexibility in tuning separation selectivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and describe two novel tunable GC×GC setups.
  • To demonstrate the ability to adjust the selectivity of the second dimension.
  • To showcase the enhanced capabilities for qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Development and comparison of two GC×GC setups with serially coupled capillary columns in the second dimension.
  • Setup 1: Tuning selectivity by adjusting the effective column length of the first secondary column within the modulator.
  • Setup 2: Tuning selectivity by adjusting the temperature offset of a separate GC oven (oven-2) housing the first secondary column.

Main Results:

  • Both setups allow for effective tuning of the second dimension's selectivity.
  • The contribution of the first secondary column can be modulated by temperature offset in Setup 2.
  • Demonstrated successful resolution of coeluting aroma compounds in coffee powder headspace using tunable GC×GC.
  • Showcased enhanced qualitative analysis by discriminating compound classes with similar retention behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Tunable GC×GC setups provide enhanced control over separation selectivity.
  • These methods improve the resolution of complex mixtures and aid in qualitative analysis.
  • The presented approaches offer significant added value for analyzing real-life samples, such as coffee aroma profiles.