Is it necessary to use three mandatory loading doses when commencing therapy for neovascular age-related macular...

To determine whether a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen with three initial mandatory loading doses results in better functional and anatomical outcome compared with a PRN regimen without initial loading when using intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with minimal classic or occult choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age-related macular degeneration.

Patients were randomised (1 : 1) to Loading (LD group) or No Loading (NLD group) and treated with open label intravitreal bevacizumab. In the LD group, patients received two mandatory doses after the baseline dose before entering the PRN phase and in the NLD group, patients did not receive mandatory doses after the baseline dose. Six-weekly evaluations were performed up to week 54 and retreatment was done based on OCT criteria. Visual stability and reduction in central retinal thickness were compared between groups.

49 patients were in the NLD group and 50 patients were in the LD group. At the 12-month end point, 84% of the patients in the LD group achieved visual stability (<15 letter loss) compared with 67% of the patients in the NLD group (P<0.05). The mean reduction in central macular thickness was 105.35 μm in the LD group and 81.45 μm in the NLD group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in scores of VFQ-25 questionnaire testing between the two groups and no serious ocular or systemic side effects were observed.

The results supported our hypothesis that a loading dose leads to slightly better visual stability in terms of proportions of patients experiencing moderate visual loss, but did not support the hypothesised difference in anatomical outcome.