Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of the Central Auditory Processing Self-Perception Questionnaire (QAPAC) applied to students, parents, and teachers.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Central auditory screening in children with behavioral dysphonia using the AudBility program.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Normative Values and Test/Retest Reliability of a New Test: Spatial Processing of Sentences in Noise in Portuguese.

BioMed research international·2025
Same author

Use of a self-perception questionnaire for screening auditory abilities in children with behavioral dysphonia.

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Presentation of an Auditory Training Protocol Applied in Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder.

CoDAS·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Temporal resolution: assessment procedures and parameters for school-aged children.

Maria Isabel Ramos do Amaral1, Paula Maria Faria Martins, Maria Francisca Colella-Santos

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Therapy, State University of Midwest - UNICENTRO/Irati-PR, Brazil.

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
|June 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test showed better performance than the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) in children, indicating normal temporal resolution skills for both tests. GIN is easier to administer, while RGDT is quicker to score.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Temporal resolution is crucial for processing speech sounds.
  • The Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Gaps-In-Noise Test (GIN) assess temporal auditory skills.
  • Understanding performance differences between these tests is important for accurate auditory assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of school-aged children on the RGDT and GIN.
  • To analyze potential differences in performance between these two temporal resolution tests.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study evaluated 28 children aged 8-10 years.
  • Children underwent peripheral audiological evaluation.
  • Performance on RGDT and GIN tests was assessed.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in performance were found based on gender, age, or ear (for GIN).
  • Mean gap detection thresholds were 9.25 ms for RGDT and approximately 4.38 ms for GIN.
  • GIN test results were significantly better (lower thresholds) than RGDT results (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

  • Both RGDT and GIN confirmed normal temporal resolution in the studied children.
  • The GIN test offers advantages in ease of application and stimulus presentation.
  • The RGDT is advantageous for its shorter administration and scoring time.