Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of pre- and postfusion conformations of class I fusion proteins with AlphaFold2.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Structure-guided compound prioritization strategy for virtual screening identifies putative binders for the nuclear receptor LRH-1.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Profiling the CFTR Variant Selectivity and Off-Target Interactions of VX-121.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

EGFR S442 ectodomain mutation confers cetuximab resistance that can be overcome by ERBB2 blockade with trastuzumab-deruxtecan.

Cancer letters·2026
Same author

Lanthipeptide structure prediction and design with Rosetta.

Methods in enzymology·2026
Same author

VUStruct: A compute pipeline for high throughput and personalized structural biology.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

An assay to quantify sexual commitment and stage conversion in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.

Nature protocols·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Direct inoculation of bioreactor-controlled stirred suspension culture with cryopreserved human pluripotent stem cells.

Nature protocols·2026
Same journal

High-throughput measurements of protein domain functions using magnetic separation.

Nature protocols·2026
Same journal

Inducing physiological polarity and performing gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 in human trophoblast organoids.

Nature protocols·2026
Same journal

Photocatalytic low-temperature defluorination of PTFE.

Nature protocols·2026
Same journal

Multimodal imaging and quantification of lanthanide chelate-labeled micro- and nanoplastics in plants.

Nature protocols·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Small-molecule ligand docking into comparative models with Rosetta.

Steven A Combs1, Samuel L Deluca, Stephanie H Deluca

  • 1Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Nature Protocols
|June 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a detailed protocol for using Rosetta software to computationally model small-molecule drug interactions with protein structures. This method aids drug design when experimental data are limited, offering a valuable computational approach for therapeutic development.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy
09:30

Modeling Ligands into Maps Derived from Electron Cryomicroscopy

Published on: July 19, 2024

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Bioinformatics
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Structure-based drug design accelerates therapeutic development.
  • Experimental structure determination (X-ray crystallography, NMR) is limited for large/flexible proteins.
  • Computational methods can predict structures and model ligand interactions in the absence of experimental data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a comprehensive protocol for docking small-molecule ligands into comparative protein models using the Rosetta modeling suite.
  • To provide a didactic example and tutorial for hands-on user experience with Rosetta.
  • To outline strategies for improving ligand docking and assessing model quality.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed protocol for comparative protein modeling, including sequence alignment, threading, and loop building.
  • Ligand docking into comparative protein models using the Rosetta suite.
  • Discussion of criteria for enhancing ligand docking accuracy and a strategy for model quality assessment.

Main Results:

  • A complete protocol for structure-based drug design using Rosetta is presented.
  • The protocol covers comparative modeling, ligand docking, and model evaluation.
  • A tutorial is provided for practical application of the Rosetta modeling suite.

Conclusions:

  • The Rosetta modeling suite offers a viable computational approach for structure-based drug design when experimental data are scarce.
  • The presented protocol facilitates the modeling of ligand interactions with protein comparative models.
  • This work provides a valuable resource for researchers seeking to utilize computational methods in drug discovery.