Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of fidaxomicin for treatment of relapsed Clostridium difficile infections in patients with cancer.

Pharmacotherapy·2014
Same author

Improving Pediatric Adverse Drug Event Reporting through Clinical Pharmacy Services.

The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG·2012
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

A clinician's guide to systematic reviews.

David M Crowther1

  • 1David M. Crowther, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0377, Houston, TX 77030, USA. dmcrowther@mdanderson.org

Nutrition in Clinical Practice : Official Publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
|June 8, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews precisely identify, evaluate, and synthesize all available literature on a topic. Despite limitations like publication bias, they offer crucial evidence synthesis for clinicians facing complex data.

Keywords:
research designreviewsystematic review

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Narrative reviews often lack rigorous methodology.
  • Synthesizing substantial or conflicting evidence is challenging for clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss systematic reviews, their execution, and their strengths and limitations.
  • To differentiate systematic reviews from narrative reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic reviews employ a priori defined methods for searching, evaluating, and synthesizing evidence.
  • Key characteristics include stated objectives, inclusion/exclusion criteria, reproducible methodology, exhaustive searches, validity assessment, and systematic reporting.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews offer a structured approach to evidence assessment.
  • Potential limitations include the quality of included evidence, study heterogeneity, and publication bias.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews are invaluable for clinicians when evidence is abundant, conflicting, or of unknown robustness.
  • They provide a reliable synthesis of available research.