Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018
[Comparison between allogeneic tendon fixation and screw fixation in ligamentous Lisfranc injury: a biomechanical
1Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Objective:
To compare the stability provided by a allogeneic tendon with a screw for the treatment of ligamentous Lisfranc injury.
Methods:
Six fresh-frozen, paired cadaveric feet were loaded in the condition of Lisfranc ligament-intact, injury and fixation models. With axial or abduction stress, the distance between medial cuneiform and second metatarsal was recorded.
Results:
With both two types of stress, there were statistically significant differences in motion detected between the intact and post-injury conditions (all P = 0.000), and the magnitudes were greater with abduction [(4.14 +/- 1.02) mm] than axial load [(1.60 +/- 0.64) mm]. In screw fixation group, the mean position changes under axial load and abduction load were (1.53 +/- 0.62) mm and (4.06 +/- 1.05) mm in post-injury model respectively, while the changes were (0.76 +/- 0.35) mm and (1.20 +/- 0.53) mm in the fixation model (all P = 0.000) which were not statistical different to that in the intact model. In allogeneic tendon fixation group, the mean position changes were (1.66 +/- 0.65) mm and (4.21 +/- 1.00) mm in the post-injury model, while were (0.90 +/- 0.41) mm and (1.33 +/- 0.61) mm in the fixation model (all P = 0.000) which also were not statistical different to that in the intact model.
Conclusion:
Under abduction stress, a significantly greater difference was found between pre- and post-injury, which may be valuable for diagnosing and testing ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Allogeneic tendon fixation can provide similar stability as screw fixation in ligamentous Lisfranc injury.