Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Characteristics of Short-Term Survivors With <i>ALK</i> or <i>ROS1</i>-Altered Metastatic NSCLC.

JTO clinical and research reports·2025
Same author

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 7.2025.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2025
Same author

Phase II Trial of LP-300 in Combination With Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Never Smoker Patients With Relapsed Advanced Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Lung After Treatment With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Clinical lung cancer·2025
Same author

Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas, Version 2.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2025
Same author

Determining Line of Therapy from Real-World Data in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2024
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Urology education under fire: Quantitative benchmarking of trainer adaptation and competency preservation in wartime Sudan.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

With great power comes great responsibility: How narrow conceptions of validity in high-stakes testing undermine competence.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Culture, power and practice: Critical discourse analysis of workplace-based assessments in hierarchical postgraduate medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

There is no way back home: A phenomenological study of the fears and future uncertainty of Afghan female medical students in Iran.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Validity of constructed-response situational judgement tests in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini-interview.

Adrian Husbands1, Jonathan Dowell

  • 1Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. ahusbands@dundee.ac.uk

Medical Education
|June 11, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) effectively predicts medical school success, outperforming the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) and Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) forms in assessing non-cognitive skills for admissions. Further research is recommended.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
07:14

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

Published on: December 23, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Admissions Assessment
  • Non-Cognitive Skills Evaluation

Background:

  • The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is Dundee Medical School's primary tool for assessing non-cognitive skills in applicants.
  • While promising, the MMI requires further validation regarding its transferability and predictive accuracy compared to other UK pre-admission measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive validity of the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) against academic performance in early medical school years.
  • To compare the MMI's effectiveness with the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) and Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) form scores.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Pearson's correlations and multiple linear regression to analyze data from 2009 and 2010 medical school entrants.
  • Examined relationships between pre-admission variables (MMI, UKCAT, UCAS) and subsequent examination scores.
  • Adjusted for range restrictions in statistically significant correlations.

Main Results:

  • The MMI demonstrated consistent predictive ability for medical school assessments across two cohorts.
  • No significant correlation was found between Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) form scores and examination performance.
  • UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) scores showed minimal predictive value.

Conclusions:

  • The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is the most consistent predictor of early medical school success in the largest undergraduate sample studied to date.
  • UKCAT and UCAS forms exhibited limited or no predictive capability for student performance.
  • Recommends longitudinal studies and replication across institutions to further validate MMI effectiveness.