Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Optimization of a Quantitative Micro-neutralization Assay
Published on: December 14, 2016
Agreement between the cell culture titrations of canine minute virus determined by two susceptibility-testing methods
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Strada per Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy.
Abstract:
The correct diagnosis of canine minute virus is critical in dog breeding. In this study, the Bland Altman test was used to compare the performance of two susceptibility-testing methods, namely polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The agreement between IFA and PCR in monocytes revealed a mean difference of -1752.16 with 95% confidence and an interval ranging from -3229.80 to -274.53 (SD=2325.62). The agreement between IFA and PCR in Walter Reed canine cells (WRCC) revealed a mean difference of -2396.55 with 95% confidence and an interval ranging from -3774.63 to -1018.48 (SD=2168.93). The Bland Altman test confirmed the overall accuracy of PCR vs IFA and the plot showed that all points were not randomly arranged in the range of average ± 1.96 × SD of the differences.
More Related Videos
12:09Measuring Influenza Neutralizing Antibody Responses to A(H3N2) Viruses in Human Sera by Microneutralization Assays Using MDCK-SIAT1 Cells
Published on: November 22, 2017
09:28Viral Concentration Determination Through Plaque Assays: Using Traditional and Novel Overlay Systems
Published on: November 4, 2014