Microbial keratitis after Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation: incidence, organisms, risk factors, and

Michelle J Kim1, Fei Yu, Anthony J Aldave

  • 1Cornea Service, The Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Ophthalmology
|June 11, 2013
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Microbial keratitis affects 13.6% of eyes after Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation. Prolonged vancomycin use and persistent epithelial defects increase infection risk, suggesting a need for enhanced antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Boston type I keratoprosthesis is a crucial option for corneal blindness.
  • Microbial keratitis is a significant complication following keratoprosthesis implantation.
  • Identifying risk factors is essential for improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of microbial keratitis after Boston type I keratoprosthesis surgery.
  • To identify risk factors associated with microbial keratitis in these patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective case series of 105 patients (125 procedures) undergoing Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation.
  • Data collected included ocular history, intraoperative details, and postoperative management.
  • Statistical analyses included Fisher exact test, log-rank test, and hazard ratio.

Main Results:

  • The incidence of presumed infectious keratitis was 13.6% (0.073 infections per eye-year).
  • Bacterial and fungal keratitis rates were 0.022 and 0.015 infections per eye-year, respectively.
  • Prolonged vancomycin use and persistent epithelial defects were associated with increased risk.

Conclusions:

  • Infectious keratitis occurs in 13.6% of eyes post-keratoprosthesis, with similar bacterial and fungal rates.
  • Eyes with persistent corneal epithelial defects or prolonged vancomycin use require enhanced antimicrobial prophylaxis.
  • Further research into prophylactic strategies is warranted to mitigate infection risk.