Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transmission Electron Microscopy01:15

Transmission Electron Microscopy

In 1931, physicist Ernst Ruska—building on the idea that magnetic fields can direct an electron beam just as lenses can direct a beam of light in an optical microscope—developed the first prototype of the electron microscope. This development led to the development of the field of electron microscopy. In the transmission electron microscope (TEM), electrons are produced by a hot tungsten element and accelerated by a potential difference in an electron gun, which gives them up to 400 keV in...
Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Overview of Electron Microscopy01:25

Overview of Electron Microscopy

The wavelengths of visible light ultimately limit the maximum theoretical resolution of images created by light microscopes. Most light microscopes can only magnify 1000X, and a few can magnify up to 1500X. Electrons, like electromagnetic radiation, can behave like waves, but with wavelengths of 0.005 nm, they produce significantly greater resolution up to 0.05 nm as compared to 500 nm for visible light. An electron microscope (EM) can create a sharp image that is magnified up to 2,000,000X.
Electron Behavior01:09

Electron Behavior

Electrons are negatively charged subatomic particles attracted to and orbit around the positively-charged nucleus of an atom. They reside in spaces associated with energy levels called shells and are further organized into subshells and orbitals within each shell.
Electrons Orbit the Nucleus
Electrons are found in specific locations outside of the nucleus. The shell in which an electron resides indicates the general energy level of the electron: those closer to the nucleus have less energy,...
Thomson's e/m Experiment01:19

Thomson's e/m Experiment

In a beam of charged particles created by a heated cathode, the particles move at different speeds. However, many applications need a beam with uniform particle speeds. An arrangement known as a velocity selector uses electric and magnetic fields to pick particles with a particular speed from the beam.
A particle with charge q, speed v, and mass m enters an area from the top, where the magnetic and electric fields are perpendicular both to the particle's motion and to one another. The magnetic...
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laser phase plate improves structure determination of small proteins by cryo-EM.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Structural Basis of Human Kinetochore-Microtubule Coupling by the Ndc80 and Ska Complexes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Structure and mechanism of microtubule stabilization and motor regulation by MAP9.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Spatially patterned cytoskeletal organization shapes astrocyte branch complexity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Liquid Phase Biological Electron Microscopy: Many Published Results and Claimed Benefits Are Fantasy, Not Fact.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2025
Same author

Structural insights into transcriptional regulation by the helicase RECQL5.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

Ranking TEM cameras by their response to electron shot noise.

Patricia Grob1, Derek Bean, Dieter Typke

  • 1Molecular and Cell Biology Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Ultramicroscopy
|June 11, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Fourier transforms of electron images reveal camera performance. This method uses shot noise analysis to compare electronic cameras, offering a straightforward evaluation technique.

Keywords:
Camera performanceModulation transfer functionNoise

More Related Videos

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
14:19

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space

Published on: February 1, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
14:19

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space

Published on: February 1, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Physics
  • Imaging Science
  • Electronic Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate characterization of electronic cameras is crucial for scientific imaging.
  • Shot noise, arising from random electron distributions, impacts image quality.
  • Comparing camera performance requires standardized, quantitative methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce two Fourier transform-based methods for evaluating electronic camera performance.
  • To compare the relative merits of different camera types using these methods.
  • To establish a simple, effective technique for camera performance assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Fourier transforms of images with random electron distributions (shot noise).
  • Modeling ideal camera response as Kronecker delta functions for comparison.
  • Characterizing single-electron response width using Lorentzian function fitting.
  • Quantifying excess noise by analyzing normalized power spectra relative to electron count.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated Fourier transform analysis of shot noise images for camera comparison.
  • Quantified single-electron response width via Lorentzian function fitting.
  • Assessed excess noise by comparing power spectra to total electron counts.
  • Presented comparative data for scintillator-coupled and direct-detection cameras.

Conclusions:

  • Fourier transform analysis of shot noise provides an effective method for comparing electronic camera performance.
  • The described techniques offer a simple and direct way to evaluate camera quality.
  • These methods are applicable to various camera types, including scintillator-coupled and direct-detection systems.