Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Crossover Experiments

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Re: Liu et al., "On the reported methodology in published TriNetX-based studies: an analysis of impossible index event designs".

European journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Potential for extreme bias due to outcome misclassification in relative measures of effect for rare time-to-event outcomes.

American journal of epidemiology·2025

Same author

TriNetX Dataworks-USA: Overview of a Multi-Purpose, De-Identified, Federated Electronic Health Record Real-World Data and Analytics Network and Comparison to the US Census.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2025

Same author

Emulating Six Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Antidiabetic Drugs in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses Based on Real-World Databases from Korea and Taiwan.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025

Same author

Predictive Modeling of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in RCTs: A Scoping Review.

JAMA network open·2025

Same author

Effectiveness of 2023-2024 seasonal influenza vaccine against influenza-associated emergency department and urgent care encounters among pregnant and non-pregnant women of reproductive age.

Vaccine·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Confounding adjustment in comparative effectiveness research conducted within distributed research networks.

Sengwee Toh¹, Joshua J Gagne, Jeremy A Rassen

¹Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA. darrentoh@post.harvard.edu

|June 12, 2013

Summary

Distributed research networks (DRNs) enable comparative effectiveness research (CER) by offering various methods to adjust for confounding factors. Confounder summary scores are particularly useful for analyzing large datasets without sharing sensitive patient information.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Health Informatics
Biostatistics
Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background:

Distributed Research Networks (DRNs) facilitate comparative effectiveness research (CER) using decentralized electronic health care databases.
Ensuring robust statistical analysis within DRNs is crucial for valid evidence generation without compromising data privacy or security.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and compare confounding adjustment strategies for observational CER studies within DRNs.
To discuss theoretical and practical considerations for selecting appropriate methods in diverse study settings.

Main Methods:

Several methods exist for simultaneous adjustment of multiple confounders, including centralized analysis, case-centered regression, aggregated data analysis, distributed regression, and meta-analysis.
These approaches vary in the required data granularity and the analytic flexibility they offer.

Main Results:

Confounder summary scores, such as propensity scores, allow adjustment for numerous confounding factors.
These methods reduce the need to transfer potentially identifiable patient-level data across sites in DRNs.

Conclusions:

As DRNs expand, methods utilizing confounder summary scores offer a viable solution for complex analyses.
These approaches can replicate analyses traditionally requiring centralized, detailed patient data, enhancing research capabilities within DRNs.