Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

10:12
Rapid and Cost-Effective RNA Extraction of Rat Pancreatic Tissue
Published on: September 19, 2020
9.6K
Evaluation of DNA and RNA extraction methods.
C S Edwin Shiaw1, M S Shiran, Y K Cheah
1University Putra Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. ykcheah@medic.upm.edu.my.
The Medical Journal of Malaysia
|June 13, 2013
Summary
This study evaluated DNA and RNA extraction methods from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. The modified enzymatic method proved efficient for DNA, while enzymatic and Chelex-100 methods were equally effective for RNA extraction.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genomic Medicine
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are valuable resources for retrospective studies.
- Efficient extraction of nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) from FFPE tissues is crucial for molecular analysis.
- Various extraction methods exist, but their efficacy on aged FFPE samples requires careful evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the efficiency of different DNA and RNA extraction protocols from archival FFPE tissues.
- To identify optimal methods for DNA and RNA recovery from FFPE samples dating back to 2004-2006.
- To provide guidance on selecting appropriate extraction techniques for FFPE-derived nucleic acids.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of four DNA extraction protocols: modified enzymatic (Method A), Chelex-100 (Method B), heat-induced alkaline (Methods C and D), and a commercial kit.
- Assessment of two RNA extraction protocols: enzymatic (Method 1) and Chelex-100 (Method 2).
- Analysis of 30 FFPE tissue blocks from 2004-2006 using the selected extraction methods.
Main Results:
- The modified enzymatic extraction method (Method A) demonstrated high efficiency for DNA extraction from FFPE tissues.
- Both the enzymatic extraction method (Method 1) and the Chelex-100 RNA extraction method (Method 2) showed comparable efficiency for RNA extraction.
- The study identified specific protocols suitable for reliable nucleic acid recovery from older FFPE samples.
Conclusions:
- The modified enzymatic method is recommended for efficient DNA extraction from archival FFPE tissues.
- For RNA extraction from FFPE samples, both enzymatic and Chelex-100 methods offer comparable and effective results.
- This comparative analysis aids researchers in selecting optimal extraction strategies for FFPE-based molecular studies.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Isolation
43.6K
DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
43.6K
DNA Isolation
197.3K
DNA from cells is required for many biotechnology and research applications, such as molecular cloning. To remove and purify DNA from cells, researchers use various methods of DNA extraction. While the specifics of different protocols may vary, some general concepts underlie the process of DNA extraction.
197.3K

