Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Assay Development for High-Throughput Drug Screening Against Mycobacteria
Published on: October 25, 2024
The use of cefepime for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Pranita D Tamma1, Sonya C T Girdwood, Ravindra Gopaul
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, MHS Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 200 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. ptamma1@jhmi.edu
Background:
AmpC β-lactamase-producing organisms are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Induction of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins after exposure to these agents complicates treatment options and carbapenems are considered optimal therapy. The role of cefepime, however, remains unclear. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes for patients receiving cefepime compared with meropenem for invasive infections caused by organisms expressing AmpC β-lactamases.
Methods:
Hospitalized patients with blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, or intra-abdominal fluid cultures growing Enterobacter spp, Serratia spp, or Citrobacter spp were evaluated using the cefotetan-boronic acid disk test and the cefotetan-cloxacillin Etest to identify organisms with AmpC β-lactamase production from February 2010 to January 2011. In patients with organisms hyperproducing AmpC β-lactamases (positive by both methods), clinical outcomes for patients receiving cefepime or meropenem therapy were compared. To minimize the possibility of treatment selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching was performed prior to regression analysis.
Results:
Of 399 patients meeting eligibility criteria, 96 (24%) had confirmed infections with AmpC β-lactamase-producing organisms. Propensity score matching of patients infected with AmpC β-lactamase-positive organisms treated with cefepime or meropenem yielded 32 well-balanced patient pairs with no difference in 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], .23-2.11; P = .36) or length of hospital stay after infection (relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, .79-1.26; P = .56) between the 2 groups.
Conclusions:
Cefepime may be a reasonable option for the treatment of invasive infections due to AmpC β-lactamase-producing organisms, particularly when adequate source control is achieved.
Insights
Cefepime and meropenem showed similar outcomes for AmpC β-lactamase-producing organism infections. This suggests cefepime is a viable treatment option when infections are properly managed.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- AmpC β-lactamase-producing organisms cause severe illness and mortality.
- Carbapenems are standard treatment, but cefepime's role is uncertain.
- Developing resistance to cephalosporins necessitates alternative therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare clinical outcomes of cefepime versus meropenem.
- Evaluate treatment efficacy for invasive infections.
- Assess infections caused by AmpC β-lactamase-producing organisms.
Main Methods:
- Identified AmpC β-lactamase production using specific disk and Etest methods.
- Compared outcomes in patients receiving cefepime or meropenem.
- Used propensity score matching to minimize treatment selection bias.
Main Results:
- 32 matched pairs of patients with AmpC β-lactamase-producing organism infections were analyzed.
- No significant difference in 30-day mortality between cefepime and meropenem groups (P = .36).
- No significant difference in hospital length of stay between the two treatment groups (P = .56).
Conclusions:
- Cefepime may be a suitable alternative for treating invasive infections.
- Effective source control is crucial for successful cefepime therapy.
- Further research may clarify cefepime's role in managing these infections.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
