Related Experiment Videos
Dynamic and static conditioning pressures evoke equivalent rapid resetting in rat aortic baroreceptors
1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.
Circulation Research
|August 1, 1990
Summary
Dynamic pressure exposure does not sensitize aortic baroreceptors. This study found no evidence that pulsatile pressure changes alter baroreceptor function or long-term responsiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Previous studies suggest pulsatile pressure may sensitize carotid sinus baroreceptors.
- Rapid resetting of baroreceptors to elevated pressures can be affected by pulsatile conditioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of dynamic (pulsatile) pressure conditioning on aortic baroreceptor function.
- To determine if dynamic pressure exposure leads to long-lasting sensitization of aortic baroreceptors.
Main Methods:
- Aortic baroreceptors were studied in an in vitro preparation.
- Baroreceptors underwent 15-minute static and dynamic pressure conditioning at various mean arterial pressure levels.
- Static discharge properties (threshold, gain) were assessed using slow pressure ramps; aortic diameter was also measured.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found in static pressure threshold before and after dynamic conditioning.
- Aortic baroreceptor static pressure threshold was linearly related to conditioning mean arterial pressure, with no difference between static and dynamic conditioning.
- Baroreceptor discharge rates returned to baseline quickly after dynamic conditioning; vessel diameter changes did not play a role.
Conclusions:
- Dynamic pressure inputs do not appear to cause long-lasting sensitization of aortic baroreceptors.
- Aortic baroreceptor responses to pressure changes are not significantly altered by short-term pulsatile conditioning.
- Findings contrast with some previous observations on carotid sinus baroreceptors.