Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Complementation Tests00:49

Complementation Tests

A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Second Uniqueness Theorem01:16

Second Uniqueness Theorem

Consider a region consisting of several individual conductors with a definite charge density in the region between these conductors. The second uniqueness theorem states that if the total charge on each conductor and the charge density in the in-between region are known, then the electric field can be uniquely determined.
In contrast, consider that the electric field is non-unique and apply Gauss's law in divergence form in the region between the conductors and the integral form to the surface...
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Principle of Equivalence01:18

Principle of Equivalence

According to Albert Einstein (1897-1955), free-falling and feeling weightless are intrinsically linked. If a person were in free-fall under gravity, for example, diving towards the Earth from an airplane, they would feel completely weightless. Similarly, a person descending in a lift may feel partially weightless. Broadly speaking, it is assumed that an object in a uniform gravitational field and an object undergoing constant acceleration in the absence of gravity are under the same...
Fundamental Theorem of Algebra01:30

Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra is central to the study of polynomial equations, asserting that every non-constant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex zero. This means that a polynomial of degree n ≥ 1, written as:  with an ≠ 0, has at least one solution in the complex number system. Since the set of real numbers is a subset of complex numbers, this theorem applies equally to polynomials with real coefficients.Building on this result, the Complete Factorization...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental Observation of Negative Weak Values for the Time Atoms Spend in the Excited State as a Photon Is Transmitted.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Erratum: Quantum State Smoothing for Linear Gaussian Systems [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 190402 (2019)].

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Nonlocality activation in a photonic quantum network.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Better Heisenberg Limits, Coherence Bounds, and Energy-Time Tradeoffs via Quantum Rényi Information.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Implications of Local Friendliness Violation for Quantum Causality.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Nonlocality in Bell's Theorem, in Bohm's Theory, and in Many Interacting Worlds Theorising.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same journal

Erratum: Spectroscopy and Ground-State Transfer of Ultracold Bosonic ^{39}K^{133}Cs Molecules [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 203401 (2025)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Lifetime of the ^{2}F_{7/2} Level in Yb^{+} for Spontaneous Emission of Electric Octupole Radiation [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 213001 (2021)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Laser-Plasma Based Seeded Free Electron Laser in the High-Gain Regime.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Parent Hamiltonians for Stabilizer Quantum Many-Body Scars.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Properties of Heavy Cosmic Nuclei Phosphorus, Chlorine, Argon, Potassium, and Calcium: Results from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Role of Spin-Isospin Symmetries in Nuclear β-Decays.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

Experimental test of universal complementarity relations.

Morgan M Weston1, Michael J W Hall, Matthew S Palsson

  • 1Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Australian Research Council), Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane QLD 4111, Australia.

Physical Review Letters
|June 18, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantum measurement accuracy is limited by complementarity, not the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. This study experimentally verifies universally valid complementarity relations using entangled photons, violating a common but limited accuracy bound.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Quantum information science
  • Quantum measurement theory

Background:

  • Complementarity fundamentally limits the precision of joint measurements for incompatible quantum observables.
  • The Heisenberg uncertainty relation, while related, does not universally quantify these complementarity limits.
  • Existing relations, like the Arthurs-Kelly relation, are not universally valid for all measurement scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally verify universally valid complementarity relations for quantum measurements.
  • To introduce and test an improved complementarity relation.
  • To demonstrate the limitations of commonly used accuracy relations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations between two photonic qubits.
  • Performing joint measurements on incompatible observables of one of the entangled qubits.
  • Quantifying measurement inaccuracies to test complementarity bounds.

Main Results:

  • Experimental verification of universally valid complementarity relations.
  • Demonstration of an improved complementarity relation.
  • Violation of the Arthurs-Kelly relation due to low product of measurement inaccuracies.

Conclusions:

  • Complementarity relations provide a universally valid framework for quantum measurement accuracy.
  • The Heisenberg uncertainty relation is not the sole or universal quantifier of complementarity.
  • The experimental results highlight the need for universally valid relations in quantum information processing.