The Long-Term Multicenter Observational Study of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Stuart J Connolly1, Lars Wallentin, Michael D Ezekowitz

  • 1Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.connostu@phri.ca

Circulation
|June 18, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Longer-term use of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation patients showed similar stroke and death rates for both doses. However, the 150 mg dose was linked to a higher risk of major bleeding compared to the 110 mg dose.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial previously established dabigatran etexilate's efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.
  • A need existed for extended follow-up data on dabigatran and direct comparisons between its two dosage regimens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of two dabigatran etexilate doses (150 mg and 110 mg twice daily) in atrial fibrillation patients.
  • To extend the follow-up period beyond the initial RE-LY trial for patients continuing dabigatran treatment.

Main Methods:

  • The Long-term Multicenter Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) trial enrolled patients from the RE-LY trial who continued their assigned dabigatran dose.
  • Follow-up extended up to 28 months post-RE-LY, with a median follow-up of 2.3 years for 5851 enrolled patients.
  • Event rates for stroke, systemic embolism, major hemorrhage, and death were analyzed for both dabigatran doses.

Main Results:

  • Stroke or systemic embolism rates were comparable between the two doses: 1.46%/year for 150 mg and 1.60%/year for 110 mg (HR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.20).
  • Major hemorrhage rates were higher with dabigatran 150 mg (3.74%/year) compared to 110 mg (2.99%/year) (HR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.53).
  • Mortality rates were similar between the two groups: 3.02%/year for 150 mg and 3.10%/year for 110 mg (HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19).

Conclusions:

  • Extended dabigatran treatment for 2.3 years showed similar rates of stroke and death for both 150 mg and 110 mg twice daily doses.
  • A significantly higher incidence of major bleeding was observed with the 150 mg dose compared to the 110 mg dose.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...