Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
Published on: February 14, 2018
Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against fungal infections in premature infants
Yoshinobu Maede1, Satoshi Ibara, Hiraku Nagasaki
1Department of Neonatology, Perinatal Medical Center, Kagoshima City Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Background:
We conducted a comparative clinical study to evaluate the prophylactic effects of micafungin (MCFG) and fluconazole (FLCZ) on the incidence of fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants who were born at a gestational age of less than 26 weeks and weighed less than 1000 g.
Methods:
With a combination of enteral administration of miconazole (6 mg/kg/day), FLCZ and MCFG were administered intravenously at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day and 3 mg/kg/day, respectively. The prophylaxis was classified as a failure when fungal infections were identified within the first 21 days after birth.
Results:
The prophylaxis was successful in seven of 18 cases (39%) in the FLCZ group and 15 of 21 cases (71%) in the MCFG group, indicating that the success rate was significantly higher in the latter group.
Conclusion:
MCFG was superior to FLCZ as prophylaxis against fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants.
Insights
Micafungin (MCFG) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to fluconazole (FLCZ) in preventing fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants. This study highlights MCFG as a more effective prophylactic agent for this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Extremely low-birthweight infants (<1000g, <26 weeks gestational age) are highly susceptible to fungal infections.
- Prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections is critical in this vulnerable neonatal population.
- Comparative efficacy of antifungal agents for prophylaxis requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prophylactic effects of micafungin (MCFG) and fluconazole (FLCZ) against fungal infections.
- To evaluate the incidence of fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants receiving either MCFG or FLCZ prophylaxis.
Main Methods:
- A comparative clinical study was conducted.
- Infants received enteral miconazole plus intravenous FLCZ (5 mg/kg/day) or intravenous MCFG (3 mg/kg/day).
- Prophylaxis failure was defined as fungal infection within 21 days of birth.
Main Results:
- The success rate of prophylaxis was significantly higher in the MCFG group (71%) compared to the FLCZ group (39%).
- MCFG prophylaxis was successful in 15 of 21 infants, while FLCZ was successful in 7 of 18 infants.
- These findings indicate a notable difference in the effectiveness of the two antifungal agents.
Conclusions:
- Micafungin (MCFG) is superior to fluconazole (FLCZ) for fungal infection prophylaxis in extremely low-birthweight infants.
- MCFG represents a more effective strategy for preventing invasive fungal infections in this high-risk neonatal group.
- The study supports the use of MCFG for enhanced antifungal protection in preterm neonates.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

