Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against fungal infections in premature infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
Published on: February 14, 2018
Yoshinobu Maede1, Satoshi Ibara, Hiraku Nagasaki
1Department of Neonatology, Perinatal Medical Center, Kagoshima City Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Background:
We conducted a comparative clinical study to evaluate the prophylactic effects of micafungin (MCFG) and fluconazole (FLCZ) on the incidence of fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants who were born at a gestational age of less than 26 weeks and weighed less than 1000 g.
Methods:
With a combination of enteral administration of miconazole (6 mg/kg/day), FLCZ and MCFG were administered intravenously at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day and 3 mg/kg/day, respectively. The prophylaxis was classified as a failure when fungal infections were identified within the first 21 days after birth.
Results:
The prophylaxis was successful in seven of 18 cases (39%) in the FLCZ group and 15 of 21 cases (71%) in the MCFG group, indicating that the success rate was significantly higher in the latter group.
Conclusion:
MCFG was superior to FLCZ as prophylaxis against fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants.
Insights
Micafungin (MCFG) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to fluconazole (FLCZ) in preventing fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants. This study highlights MCFG as a more effective prophylactic agent for this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Extremely low-birthweight infants (<1000g, <26 weeks gestational age) are highly susceptible to fungal infections.
- Prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections is critical in this vulnerable neonatal population.
- Comparative efficacy of antifungal agents for prophylaxis requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prophylactic effects of micafungin (MCFG) and fluconazole (FLCZ) against fungal infections.
- To evaluate the incidence of fungal infections in extremely low-birthweight infants receiving either MCFG or FLCZ prophylaxis.
Main Methods:
- A comparative clinical study was conducted.
- Infants received enteral miconazole plus intravenous FLCZ (5 mg/kg/day) or intravenous MCFG (3 mg/kg/day).
- Prophylaxis failure was defined as fungal infection within 21 days of birth.
Main Results:
- The success rate of prophylaxis was significantly higher in the MCFG group (71%) compared to the FLCZ group (39%).
- MCFG prophylaxis was successful in 15 of 21 infants, while FLCZ was successful in 7 of 18 infants.
- These findings indicate a notable difference in the effectiveness of the two antifungal agents.
Conclusions:
- Micafungin (MCFG) is superior to fluconazole (FLCZ) for fungal infection prophylaxis in extremely low-birthweight infants.
- MCFG represents a more effective strategy for preventing invasive fungal infections in this high-risk neonatal group.
- The study supports the use of MCFG for enhanced antifungal protection in preterm neonates.
Related Concept Videos
Antifungal Agents
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

