Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in patients with return of spontaneous circulation
Ying-Qing Li1, Shu-Jie Sun, Na Liu
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Emergency Department, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis both improve hospital discharge rates in cardiac arrest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were similar between the two treatments after spontaneous circulation was restored.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition often leading to cardiac arrest.
- Restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a key goal in managing cardiac arrest.
- Reperfusion therapy, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolysis, is crucial post-ROSC in STEMI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and thrombolysis in STEMI patients post-ROSC.
- To assess the impact of these interventions on hospital discharge and neurological recovery rates.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of clinical studies published between January 1995 and October 2012.
- Inclusion of studies indexed in PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases.
- Comparison of hospital discharge and neurological recovery rates between PCI and thrombolysis groups.
Main Results:
- Both PCI and thrombolysis significantly improved hospital discharge rates (p<0.001 for both).
- No significant difference in hospital discharge rates was observed between PCI and thrombolysis (p = 0.543).
- Neurological recovery rates were also comparable between the two treatment groups (p = 0.165).
Conclusions:
- Both PCI and thrombolysis are effective in improving hospital discharge rates for STEMI patients with ROSC.
- PCI and thrombolysis demonstrate similar efficacy regarding hospital discharge and neurological recovery in this patient population.
Objective:
To evaluate the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis after restoration of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction using meta-analysis.
Methods:
We performed a meta-analysis of clinical studies indexed in the PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and published between January 1995 and October 2012. In addition, we compared the hospital discharge and neurological recovery rates between the patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention and those who received thrombolysis.
Results:
Twenty-four studies evaluating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention or thrombolysis after restoration of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included. Seventeen of the 24 studies were used in this meta-analysis. All studies were used to compare percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis. The meta-analysis showed that the rate of hospital discharge improved with both percutaneous coronary intervention (p<0.001) and thrombolysis (p<0.001). We also found that cardiac arrest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who received thrombolysis after restoration of spontaneous circulation did not have decreased hospital discharge (p = 0.543) or neurological recovery rates (p = 0.165) compared with those who received percutaneous coronary intervention.
Conclusion:
In cardiac arrest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who achieved restoration of spontaneous circulation, both percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis improved the hospital discharge rate. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the hospital discharge and neurological recovery rates between the percutaneous coronary intervention-treated group and the thrombolysis-treated group.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

