Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
The Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmill for Knee Osteoarthritis Rehabilitation
Published on: July 22, 2019
Randomised controlled trial comparing early home biofeedback physiotherapy with pelvic floor exercises for the
C Peirce1, C Murphy, M Fitzpatrick
1National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Objective:
To compare early home biofeedback physiotherapy with pelvic floor exercises (PFEs) for the initial management of women sustaining a primary third-degree tear.
Design:
Single centre, randomised trial.
Setting:
National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Population:
A total of 120 women sustaining a primary third-degree tear.
Methods:
Women were randomised in a one to three ratio: 30 to early postpartum home biofeedback physiotherapy and 90 to PFEs.
Main Outcome Measures:
Differences in anorectal manometry results, Cleveland Clinic continence scores and Rockwood faecal incontinence quality of life scale scores after 3 months of postpartum treatment.
Results:
The mean anal resting pressure was 39 ± 13 mmHg in the early biofeedback physiotherapy group and 43 ± 17 mmHg in the PFE group. The mean anal squeeze pressure was 64 ± 17 mmHg in the biofeedback group and 62 ± 23 mmHg in the PFE group. There was no significant difference in anal resting and squeeze pressure values between the groups (P = 0.123 and P = 0.68, respectively). There were no differences in symptom score and quality of life measurements between the groups.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates no added value in using early home biofeedback physiotherapy in the management of women sustaining third-degree tears. Poor compliance may have contributed because women found it difficult to designate time to using biofeedback.