Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Refining RDoC Using Individual-Level Task fMRI Factor Models Reveals Reproducible and Clinically Relevant Brain-Wide Motifs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Telehealth Versus In-Person Caregiver-Mediated Behavioral Treatment for Challenging Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for COACH (Caregiver Outreach for Autism Coaching at Home) Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Training Clinicians in Private Practice in Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Online Approaches.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Family vs Individual Treatment for Children With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same author

Randomized feasibility trial of tele-yoga versus in-person yoga for treating chronic musculoskeletal pain in veterans.

BMC complementary medicine and therapies·2026
Same author

Stanford neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial confirming efficacy, and an EEG study providing insight into mechanism of action and a potentially predictive biomarker of efficacy.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Using Potential Outcomes to Understand Causal Mediation Analysis: Comment on.

Kosuke Imai1, Booil Jo, Elizabeth A Stuart

  • 1Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton NJ 08544. -258-6601, URL: http://imai.princeton.edu.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|June 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The potential outcomes framework clarifies causal mediation analysis assumptions. This approach enables new research designs and statistical methods for longitudinal data, improving causal inference.

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Causal Inference
  • Statistical Methods
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Causal mediation analysis is crucial for understanding indirect effects in complex relationships.
  • Identifying key assumptions in causal mediation analysis is essential for valid inference.
  • Existing methods may have limitations in fully addressing identification challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the utility of the potential outcomes framework in understanding causal mediation analysis.
  • To illustrate how this framework can illuminate core identification assumptions.
  • To propose alternative research designs and statistical strategies for longitudinal data.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual commentary applying the potential outcomes framework.
  • Analysis of identification assumptions in causal mediation.
  • Adaptation of strategies for longitudinal data settings.

Main Results:

  • The potential outcomes framework provides a clear lens for examining identification assumptions.
  • This framework facilitates the development of novel research designs.
  • Alternative statistical analysis strategies applicable to longitudinal data are proposed.

Conclusions:

  • The potential outcomes framework enhances the understanding and application of causal mediation analysis.
  • It offers a robust approach for addressing identification challenges in longitudinal studies.
  • This work contributes to more rigorous causal inference in observational research.