Sensitivity of male reproductive endpoints in nonhuman primate toxicity studies: a statistical power analysis

G D Cappon1, D Potter, M E Hurtt

  • 1Worldwide Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT 06340, USA. Gregg.d.cappon@pfizer.com

Insights

Male reproductive toxicity studies in non-human primates (NHPs) show poor sensitivity for detecting adverse effects with standard endpoints. Larger group sizes are needed to reliably identify reproductive toxicity in male NHPs.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Reproductive Toxicology
  • Non-human Primate Studies

Background:

  • Assessing male reproductive toxicity is crucial in non-human primate (NHP) safety studies.
  • Standard endpoints may lack the sensitivity to detect subtle adverse effects.
  • Understanding the power of existing endpoints informs study design and interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the statistical power of routine and triggered male reproductive toxicity endpoints in NHPs.
  • To determine the group size required for detecting specific effect sizes with adequate power.
  • To assess the sensitivity of various endpoints, including organ weights, testicular volume, seminal parameters, and hormone levels.

Main Methods:

  • Power analysis was conducted using control data from sexually mature Asian and Mauritian NHPs.
  • The analysis focused on the ability to detect a 50% change from control values.
  • Evaluated endpoints included male reproductive organ weights, testicular volume, seminal analyses, and serum hormone levels.

Main Results:

  • Power to detect a 50% change was low across most endpoints with a group size of 3 NHPs (e.g., 13-30% for organ weights, ~30% for testicular volume).
  • Seminal analyses (6-66%) and male hormone levels (10-78%) showed variable but generally insufficient power.
  • Overall, current male reproductive endpoints exhibit poor power (<80%) to detect significant changes with small group sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Standard male reproductive toxicity endpoints in NHPs have limited sensitivity for detecting adverse effects, especially with small group sizes.
  • Confidently identifying male reproductive toxicity likely necessitates specialized study designs with larger sample sizes.
  • Triggering non-routine endpoints in specific cases may not substantially enhance the sensitivity for detecting adverse male reproductive effects.

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...