Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Determination of Reproductive Competence by Confirming Pubertal Onset and Performing a Fertility Assay in Mice and Rats
Published on: October 13, 2018
Sensitivity of male reproductive endpoints in nonhuman primate toxicity studies: a statistical power analysis
G D Cappon1, D Potter, M E Hurtt
1Worldwide Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT 06340, USA. Gregg.d.cappon@pfizer.com
Abstract:
To determine the sensitivity of male reproductive toxicity endpoints in NHPs we performed a power analysis of routine and triggered endpoints using control data from sexually mature Asian and Mauritian NHPs. The power to detect a 50% change from control was 13-30% for male reproductive organ weights, ∼30% for testicular volume, 6-66% for seminal analyses and 10-78% for male hormones. Overall, male reproductive endpoints have poor power (less than 80%) to detect a 50% change from control with a group size of 3 monkeys. Confidently identifying adverse male reproductive effects with these endpoints would likely require specialized study designs with larger group sizes. Triggering of non-routine endpoints in cases where there is special concern for male reproductive toxicity is unlikely to increase sensitivity to detect adverse effects.
Insights
Male reproductive toxicity studies in non-human primates (NHPs) show poor sensitivity for detecting adverse effects with standard endpoints. Larger group sizes are needed to reliably identify reproductive toxicity in male NHPs.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Reproductive Toxicology
- Non-human Primate Studies
Background:
- Assessing male reproductive toxicity is crucial in non-human primate (NHP) safety studies.
- Standard endpoints may lack the sensitivity to detect subtle adverse effects.
- Understanding the power of existing endpoints informs study design and interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the statistical power of routine and triggered male reproductive toxicity endpoints in NHPs.
- To determine the group size required for detecting specific effect sizes with adequate power.
- To assess the sensitivity of various endpoints, including organ weights, testicular volume, seminal parameters, and hormone levels.
Main Methods:
- Power analysis was conducted using control data from sexually mature Asian and Mauritian NHPs.
- The analysis focused on the ability to detect a 50% change from control values.
- Evaluated endpoints included male reproductive organ weights, testicular volume, seminal analyses, and serum hormone levels.
Main Results:
- Power to detect a 50% change was low across most endpoints with a group size of 3 NHPs (e.g., 13-30% for organ weights, ~30% for testicular volume).
- Seminal analyses (6-66%) and male hormone levels (10-78%) showed variable but generally insufficient power.
- Overall, current male reproductive endpoints exhibit poor power (<80%) to detect significant changes with small group sizes.
Conclusions:
- Standard male reproductive toxicity endpoints in NHPs have limited sensitivity for detecting adverse effects, especially with small group sizes.
- Confidently identifying male reproductive toxicity likely necessitates specialized study designs with larger sample sizes.
- Triggering non-routine endpoints in specific cases may not substantially enhance the sensitivity for detecting adverse male reproductive effects.
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

