Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Trial suggests no difference between single-visit and two-visit root canal treatment
1Center of Excellence in Osteoporosis Research, School of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.
A single-visit root canal treatment (RoCT) is as effective as a two-visit procedure for healing apical periodontitis. This randomized controlled trial found no significant difference in radiographic outcomes between one and two-visit root canal treatments.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Public Health
Background:
- Apical periodontitis requires effective root canal treatment (RoCT).
- The number of treatment visits may influence clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the success rates of single-visit versus two-visit root canal treatment (RoCT) for apical periodontitis.
Main Methods:
- Randomised controlled trial involving 287 patients (300 teeth) with apical periodontitis.
- Intervention: Patients received either single-visit or two-visit RoCT.
- Outcome measure: Clinical and radiographic evaluation at two years by masked examiners.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in periapical healing between single-visit and two-visit RoCT at two years.
- Healing rates were 96.57% for single-visit and 88.97% for two-visit treatments.
- Eighteen teeth were lost to follow-up (nine from each group).
Conclusions:
- Meticulously instrumented single-visit RoCT is as successful as two-visit treatment.
- Radiographic evidence of periapical healing shows no significant difference between single-visit and two-visit RoCT.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
