Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
Published on: August 1, 2018
Visual attention during neonatal imitation in newborn macaque monkeys
Elizabeth A Simpson1, Annika Paukner, Stephen J Suomi
1Eunice Kennedy ShriverNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Laboratory of Comparative Ethology, Poolesville, MD; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy. elizabethannsimpson@gmail.com.
Neonatal imitation of facial gestures in rhesus macaques varies. Infant visual attention influences lipsmacking (LPS) imitation, but tongue protrusion (TP) imitation requires focused attention on faces.
Area of Science:
- Primate behavior
- Developmental psychology
- Comparative cognition
Background:
- Neonatal imitation of facial gestures is observed in rhesus macaques.
- Individual differences exist in imitation abilities among infant macaques.
- The role of visual attention in neonatal imitation is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether individual differences in visual attention explain imitation of lipsmacking (LPS) and tongue protrusion (TP) gestures in newborn rhesus macaques.
- To explore the relationship between visual attention, gesture type, and imitation accuracy.
- To understand the underlying mechanisms of neonatal facial imitation.
Main Methods:
- Observational study of 49 newborn rhesus macaques.
- Measurement of infant visual attention towards experimenter faces and control stimuli.
- Assessment of imitation accuracy for lipsmacking and tongue protrusion gestures.
- Comparison of attention and imitation between imitators and non-imitators.
Main Results:
- Infants imitating lipsmacking (LPS) showed greater visual attention to faces and control stimuli than non-imitators.
- Lipsmacking (LPS) imitation accuracy was not dependent on visual attention to faces.
- Tongue protrusion (TP) imitation was more accurate when infants were visually attending to faces.
- TP imitators did not show significantly different visual attention compared to non-imitators.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences in visual attention may specifically relate to lipsmacking (LPS) imitation in rhesus macaques.
- Lipsmacking (LPS) imitation may require less focused visual attention, possibly due to its natural communicative function.
- Tongue protrusion (TP) imitation appears to be more dependent on direct visual engagement with the face.
- Infant visual attention during neonatal assessments can provide insights into the conditions supporting facial imitation skills.
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Imprinting

