Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
The Nativist Approach01:21

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

A theory-driven structural equation modeling approach to the behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems model of chronic pain: Evaluating the mediating role of self-regulatory and volitional abilities.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

The effects of communicating illness diagnostic and treatment information and C-reactive protein test results on people's antibiotic expectations.

British journal of health psychology·2025
Same author

Multi-region investigation of 'man' as default in attitudes.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Emphasizing the importance of prudent antibiotic use decreases unrealistic perceptions of new antibiotic discoveries.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.

Miroslav Sirota1, Marie Juanchich, York Hagmayer

  • 1Medical Decision Making and Informatics Research Group, School of Medicine, King's College London, Capital House, 7th floor, 42 Weston Street, SE1 3QD, London, UK, miroslav.sirota@kcl.ac.uk.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Presenting Bayesian inference problems using natural frequencies improves performance. Individual cognitive differences, particularly analytical thinking, support the nested sets account over the ecological rationality account for Bayesian reasoning.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Bayesian Reasoning

Background:

  • Natural frequencies enhance Bayesian inference performance compared to probabilities.
  • Individual differences in cognitive processing of Bayesian reasoning are understudied.
  • Two accounts explain natural frequency benefits: ecological rationality (automatic processing) and nested sets (analytical processing).

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how individual cognitive differences influence Bayesian reasoning performance.
  • Test process-oriented variants of the ecological rationality account (ERA) and nested sets account (NSA).
  • Determine which account is better supported by evidence from individual cognitive differences.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to assess Bayesian reasoning.
  • Experiment 1 examined cognitive reflection abilities with different object parsing.
  • Experiment 2 assessed cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions (analytical vs. intuitive) with probabilities and natural frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Cognitive reflection abilities predicted performance regardless of object parsing in Experiment 1.
  • Cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions predicted performance for both probabilities and natural frequencies in Experiment 2.
  • Findings indicate analytical processing enhances Bayesian reasoning.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in cognitive processing provide stronger support for the nested sets account (NSA).
  • Analytical thinking appears crucial for improving Bayesian reasoning performance.
  • The study challenges the purely automatic processing explanation offered by the ecological rationality account (ERA).