Carotid artery stenting outcomes: do they correlate with antiplatelet response assays?

Grant C Sorkin1, Travis M Dumont, Michael M Wach

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Insights

Higher P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) correlate with increased stroke risk. A PRU of 198 or less may improve outcomes, but further research is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroendovascular Intervention
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Limited data exist on antiplatelet response assays in neuroendovascular procedures.
  • Carotid artery stenting (CAS) requires effective antiplatelet therapy to prevent ischemic events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between aspirin and P2Y12 assay results and clinical outcomes following CAS.
  • To determine optimal thresholds for P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) to predict post-CAS complications.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 449 patients undergoing CAS with pre-intervention antiplatelet therapy.
  • Aspirin and P2Y12 assays performed on postoperative day 0/1.
  • Outcomes assessed included neurological ischemic sequelae, death, hemorrhage, and myocardial infarction at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

Main Results:

  • Higher mean PRU values were observed in patients experiencing ischemic events (stroke/TIA) or stroke at 1 and 2 years post-CAS.
  • Patients with PRU ≤198 demonstrated longer ischemic event-free survival and overall survival compared to those with PRU ≤237.
  • Higher mean PRU values were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality; no correlation was found between lower PRU and hemorrhage.
  • Aspirin reaction units did not correlate with clinical outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • A P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) threshold of ≤198 may be associated with reduced ischemic neurological sequelae and mortality post-CAS.
  • Prospective studies are necessary to confirm the relationship between antiplatelet assay monitoring and outcomes in patients undergoing CAS.
Abstract