Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does family interaction prevent adolescent pregnancy?

L M Casper1

  • 1Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Family Planning Perspectives
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cross-national look at married women's earnings dependency.

Gender issues·2002
Same author

How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation.

Demography·2000
Same author

Work, income, the economy, and married fathers as child-care providers.

Demography·1998
Same author

Family networks in prenatal and postnatal health.

Social biology·1990
This summary is machine-generated.

Family interaction may encourage contraceptive use among adolescents but does not prevent sexual activity. Policies focusing solely on family interaction are unlikely to be effective in preventing adolescent pregnancy.

Area of Science:

  • Sociology
  • Public Health
  • Demography

Background:

  • Adolescent sexual activity, pregnancy, and childbearing remain significant public health concerns.
  • Understanding factors influencing adolescent reproductive decisions is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between family interaction and adolescent sexual activity, pregnancy, childbearing, and parenthood.
  • To determine if family interaction influences contraceptive use, abortion, or adoption as alternatives to parenthood.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth.
  • Employed logistic regression procedures to analyze the relationship between family interaction and adolescent reproductive outcomes.
Keywords:
Abortion SeekersAbortion, InducedAdolescent PregnancyAdolescentsAdolescents, FemaleAdoptionAge FactorsAmericasBehaviorChild RearingCommunicationContraceptionContraceptive UsageData AnalysisDecision MakingDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesEconomic FactorsFamily And HouseholdFamily CharacteristicsFamily PlanningFamily RelationshipsFertilityFertility Control, PostconceptionInterpersonal RelationsLogistic ModelMathematical ModelModels, TheoreticalNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaParentsPopulationPopulation CharacteristicsPopulation DynamicsPremarital Sex BehaviorPsychological FactorsReproductive BehaviorResearch MethodologySampling StudiesSex BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsStatistical RegressionStudiesSurveysUnited StatesYouth

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Family interaction was associated with increased contraceptive use and consideration of abortion or adoption.
  • Family interaction did not significantly reduce adolescent sexual activity or improve maternal and child well-being.
  • Factors like race, religion, residence, mother's education, adolescent age, and family income were linked to pregnancy prevention.

Conclusions:

  • While family interaction may promote safer sexual practices, it is not a sole determinant in preventing adolescent sexual activity or pregnancy.
  • Interventions should consider a multifaceted approach, incorporating demographic and socioeconomic factors, rather than relying exclusively on family interaction.