Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

11:17
Thoracoscopic Extended Right Middle Plus Lower Sleeve Lobectomy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: February 27, 2026
Current readings: sublobar resection for non-small-cell lung cancer
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA. jessica.donington@nyumc.org
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|June 27, 2013
Summary
Sublobar resection may be a viable alternative to lobectomy for select stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, offering comparable outcomes with reduced risk. This review examines its use in medically unfit patients and identifies suitable candidates within the standard-risk population.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Oncology
- Pulmonary Medicine
Background:
- The 1995 Lung Cancer Study Group consensus recommended lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to minimize recurrence risk.
- Advances in imaging and molecular biology have identified smaller, more indolent NSCLC tumors in recent patient cohorts.
- Single-institution trials suggest sublobar resection offers comparable survival and recurrence rates to lobectomy in well-selected patients, with a better risk profile.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current literature on sublobar resections for stage I NSCLC.
- To compare sublobar resections with nonoperative ablative therapies for medically unfit patients.
- To identify patient subsets within the standard-risk population for whom sublobar resection yields equivalent outcomes to lobectomy.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of recent studies on sublobar resections for stage I NSCLC.
- Analysis of comparative data between sublobar resection and lobectomy.
- Evaluation of outcomes for medically unfit patients undergoing sublobar resection or ablative therapies.
- Identification of criteria for selecting standard-risk patients for sublobar resection.
Main Results:
- Sublobar resection shows promise as an alternative to lobectomy for specific stage I NSCLC cases.
- Evidence suggests comparable survival and recurrence rates between sublobar resection and lobectomy in selected patients.
- The review addresses the efficacy of sublobar resection versus nonoperative options for medically compromised individuals.
- Key factors for identifying suitable candidates for sublobar resection in the standard-risk population are explored.
Conclusions:
- Sublobar resection is an increasingly viable option for stage I NSCLC, particularly in selected patient groups.
- Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria for sublobar resection in both medically unfit and standard-risk populations.
- The findings challenge the traditional reliance on lobectomy for all stage I NSCLC, advocating for personalized treatment approaches.
