Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to "Comment on wisdom of the crowd: ensuring the justness and validity of group decision-making in solid organ transplant".

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2026
Same author

Standardized Workload Assessment Metric for Pediatric Emergency Departments (SWAMPED): Multicenter Derivation and Evaluation of a Task-Level Workload Measure.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain : A Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Trial.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Implementation of a Systematic Patient Mobility Program Across 5 Hospitals.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2026
Same author

Nexus of IDO1/Kynurenine Pathway to T-Cell Exhaustion: Hypoxia-Induced Tryptophan Metabolism in Glioblastoma.

Metabolites·2026
Same author

Wisdom of the Crowd: Ensuring the justness and validity of group decision-making in solid organ transplant.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

In-group bias in residency selection.

Adam Bass1, Caren Wu, Jeffrey P Schaefer

  • 1University of Calgary, Canada.

Medical Teacher
|June 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Residents show bias favoring internal applicants during medical residency selection. This in-group bias, particularly among residents, may impact fair evaluation and requires further investigation to ensure equitable processes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Residency Training
  • Applicant Selection

Background:

  • Over half of Canadian medical graduates pursue residency at their home institution.
  • Existing literature suggests potential biases in resident selection processes.
  • This study investigates partiality towards internal applicants in residency programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore potential bias in resident selection.
  • To determine if internal applicants receive preferential treatment.
  • To examine the influence of applicant affiliation on rater decisions.

Main Methods:

  • An observational study compared ratings of internal and external applicants.
  • Resident and faculty raters evaluated application packages and interviews.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
09:55

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology

Published on: September 28, 2022

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

  • A second study involved residents rating manipulated anonymous applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Residents rated internal applicants significantly higher than external applicants for both applications and interviews.
    • Faculty ratings showed no significant difference between internal and external applicants.
    • Residents favored applicants with any affiliation to the program over unaffiliated ones.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings suggest in-group bias by residents in medical residency selection.
    • Interdependent relationships between residents and students may contribute to bias.
    • Further research is needed to identify and mitigate bias in residency applications.