Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short...
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short...
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing01:28

CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR01:23

The Antiviral System of Bacteria and Archaea: CRISPR

CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats is a adaptive immune system found in bacteria and archaea that protects against viral infections. This system enables prokaryotic cells to identify, remember, and neutralize foreign genetic elements, primarily bacteriophages, by storing fragments of the invader’s DNA as a genetic memory.The CRISPR immune response begins during an initial infection. Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins play a central role in this defense.
CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The CRISPR ring nuclease Csx15 oligomerises on cyclic nucleotide binding to regulate antiviral defence.

The Biochemical journal·2026
Same author

Myxarylin: Total <i>In Vitro</i> Biosynthesis, Expansion of Substrate Scope, and Bioengineered Thioamidated Biarylitides.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Structure and mechanism of the broad spectrum CRISPR-associated ring nuclease Crn4.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems including rare variants.

Nature microbiology·2025
Same author

A viral SAVED protein with ring nuclease activity degrades the CRISPR second messenger cA4.

The Biochemical journal·2025
Same author

Bacteria use a decoy defence molecule to set a trap for viruses.

Nature·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
10:46

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

CRISPR interference: a structural perspective.

Judith Reeks1, James H Naismith, Malcolm F White

  • 1Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, UK.

The Biochemical Journal
|June 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores how bacteria use CRISPR-Cas systems to defend against viruses. It highlights the structural details of proteins that process genetic material to identify and destroy invaders.

Keywords:
Cas proteinscrRNA biogenesisprokaryotic immunitymolecular architecture

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

Genome Editing in Mammalian Cell Lines using CRISPR-Cas
07:56

Genome Editing in Mammalian Cell Lines using CRISPR-Cas

Published on: April 11, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
10:46

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins

Published on: October 18, 2022

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells
11:35

Selection-dependent and Independent Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Knockouts in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2017

Genome Editing in Mammalian Cell Lines using CRISPR-Cas
07:56

Genome Editing in Mammalian Cell Lines using CRISPR-Cas

Published on: April 11, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology of CRISPR interference systems
  • Molecular genetics and prokaryotic immunity

Background:

Prokaryotic organisms face constant threats from mobile genetic elements that compromise cellular integrity. While scientists recognize these defense mechanisms, the precise structural arrangements governing their function remain partially obscured. Prior research has shown that these systems utilize specialized ribonucleic acid molecules for target identification. That uncertainty drove investigators to examine how protein complexes facilitate this process. No prior work had resolved the full diversity of catalytic strategies employed by these molecular machines. This gap motivated a deeper look into the architecture of interference complexes. Previous studies often focused on individual components rather than the integrated structural landscape. Understanding these configurations is necessary to grasp the broader evolutionary history of microbial immunity.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to synthesize recent progress on the structural biology of the CRISPR-Cas system. Researchers sought to clarify how Cas proteins and complexes facilitate crRNA biogenesis. They addressed the need to understand the mechanisms underlying interference at a molecular level. This study explores the structural diversity of proteins involved in identifying foreign nucleic acids. The authors investigated how these systems provide adaptive immunity against mobile genetic elements. They focused on the specific roles of Cas proteins in processing genetic information. This work clarifies the structural basis for sequence-dependent degradation of invading entities. The review provides a detailed account of the physical interactions that drive prokaryotic defense.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a comprehensive synthesis of recent literature regarding protein architecture. Investigators evaluated structural data derived from high-resolution imaging techniques. They focused on the spatial arrangement of Cas proteins within functional complexes. The authors compared domain organization across different protein families to identify common motifs. This methodology prioritized studies that elucidated the mechanisms of crRNA processing. Researchers examined how these proteins catalyze the degradation of foreign genetic sequences. They integrated findings from multiple structural studies to map evolutionary relationships. The analysis provides a unified perspective on the physical components of the defense system.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature reveal significant diversity in how Cas6 and Cas5 recognize and cleave crRNA. Structural analysis confirms the presence of the RAMP domain across several protein families. The data demonstrate that RAMP-like domains exist within Cas2 and Cas10 proteins. Researchers identified an evolutionary link between the small subunits of type I and type III-B complexes. These results indicate that structural biology provides a clear view of the catalytic mechanisms. The literature shows that these proteins form complex assemblies to facilitate interference. Evidence suggests that the architecture of these systems is highly specialized for nucleic acid degradation. The findings highlight the importance of structural motifs in maintaining immune function.

Conclusions:

The authors synthesize recent structural data to clarify how Cas proteins orchestrate immune responses. They highlight that substrate recognition strategies exhibit significant variation across different protein families. The review underscores the prevalence of RNA-binding domains across multiple Cas types. Researchers propose that structural analysis reveals deep evolutionary connections between distinct interference complexes. These findings imply that the architecture of these systems is more conserved than previously assumed. The synthesis suggests that future investigations into complex assembly will refine current models of immunity. Authors emphasize that structural insights are transforming the field by providing a clear view of molecular interactions. This work provides a foundation for interpreting how these systems adapt to diverse genetic threats.

The researchers propose that Cas proteins utilize crRNA to identify and subsequently degrade foreign nucleic acids. This interference process relies on sequence-dependent recognition, where specific protein complexes catalyze the destruction of invading genetic material to ensure cellular survival.

The RAMP domain is a specialized RNA-binding structure identified in Cas5, Cas6, Cas7, and Cmr3 families. These motifs are also present in Cas2 and Cas10, suggesting a shared structural basis for RNA interaction across various protein types.

Structural analysis is necessary to resolve the diverse catalytic strategies used by Cas6 and Cas5. These proteins demonstrate unique ways of recognizing and cleaving crRNA, which would remain hidden without high-resolution imaging of their binding pockets.

The authors indicate that these small subunits serve as an evolutionary link between type I and type III-B systems. This connection suggests that different interference complexes share a common ancestral origin despite their functional divergence.

The researchers observe remarkable diversity in how these proteins interact with their substrates. While some proteins show high specificity, others exhibit flexible binding modes, highlighting the varied evolutionary paths taken by prokaryotic defense systems.

The authors suggest that ongoing research into these complexes will fundamentally alter our comprehension of microbial immunity. By mapping the constituent components, scientists can better predict how these systems evolve to counter new viral threats.