Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Negative and Positive Feedback01:18

Negative and Positive Feedback

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association Between Physician Licensing and Certification Examination Performance and Quality of Patient Care: A Systematic Review.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Insights and priorities from the 2025 private funders' Parkinson's disease and related disorders large footprint data interoperability summit.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Exploration of factors influencing the insufficient rate of tetanus vaccination among young women in an urban health zone: A cross-sectional study.

Medicine·2026
Same author

Diversity and Experiences of Radiation Oncologists in Canada: A Survey of Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Disability, Race, Ethnicity, Religion, and Workplace Discrimination-A National Cross-Sectional Electronic Survey.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Understanding Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Within Canadian Radiation Oncology Training Programs: A National Survey of Residents and Fellows.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2025
Same author

Recurrent pregnancy loss, psychological distress and wellbeing support for women: a mixed-methods analysis.

BMC women's health·2025
Same journal

The Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program: A Model for Increasing Diversity in Surgical Specialties.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Toward a global ecosystem for health professions education: harnessing open educational resources and generative AI with shared governance.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Fostering conversation and co-regulation: how medical students experience co-creating narrative feedback.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Understanding accelerated 3-year MD program graduates: key considerations for residency directors.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Building the foundation of clinical training: a mixed-methods study of pre-clerkship clinical preceptors and retention.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?

Nancy L Dudek1, Meridith B Marks, Glen Bandiera

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ndudek@toh.on.ca

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|June 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

An "at-home" faculty development program significantly improved the quality of in-training evaluation reports (ITERs) for clinical faculty. This minimal intervention offers a scalable solution for enhancing physician assessment skills.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Faculty Development
  • Assessment Quality

Background:

  • Clinical faculty frequently produce low-quality in-training evaluation reports (ITERs).
  • Traditional faculty development (FD) workshops have limited physician attendance.
  • An "at-home" FD program was developed to provide feedback on ITER quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of an
  • Main_Methods

Main Methods:

  • Ninety-eight clinical supervisors were randomized into control and feedback groups.
  • ITER quality was assessed using the Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) tool.
  • Participants received feedback on their ITER quality over three assessment cycles.

Main Results:

  • Mean CCERR scores significantly increased over time in the feedback groups (n=27).
  • The control group (n=10) showed no significant increase in ITER quality.
  • The
  • Conclusions

Conclusions:

  • A minimal