Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Liability for failure to warn of a risk that does not materialize?
1Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. ad535@cam.ac.uk
Abstract:
Doctors in the UK may be reconciled to the fact that they can be held liable for failing to warn patients about complications associated with procedures. They nevertheless might reasonably assume that their liability will be confined to situations where there has been a failure to warn about an inherent complication that subsequently occurred. It might therefore also be assumed that, where a doctor has properly warned the patient about the risk of the complication, the patient cannot seek to recover but this short paper describes several overseas cases where doctors have been held liable in these situations and postulates why courts in the UK may be attracted to this extension of liability.
Related Concept Videos
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Hindsight Biases
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Hazard Rate
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...