Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
Published on: March 3, 2023
The influence of compliance with the use of refractive correction in hyperopic children on accommodation
Stamatis D Gatzonis1, Vasiliki P Follidi
1Department of Ophthalmology, Euroclinic Children's Hospital, Athens - Greece.
Insights
Constant, correct use of hyperopic spectacles in children with significant hyperopia helps relax accommodation. This consistent wear is a reliable indicator of patient compliance with prescribed treatment.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Optometry
- Vision Science
Background:
- Hyperopia is a common refractive error in children.
- Uncorrected hyperopia can lead to accommodative issues and potentially strabismus.
- The role of spectacle correction in managing accommodative function requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between consistent use of hyperopic spectacles and accommodative relaxation in children.
- To assess the impact of spectacle compliance on refractive outcomes in pediatric hyperopia.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 52 children (2.5-9 years) with hyperopia >3 D underwent ophthalmic examination.
- Children received full or partial correction with hyperopic glasses.
- Manifest hyperopia was measured using an autorefractometer at 3 and 6 months to assess compliance and accommodative response.
Main Results:
- Children with constant, correct spectacle wear showed refractive measurements consistent with their prescribed glasses.
- In contrast, children with partial or incorrect wear exhibited unexpressed hyperopia, with some showing myopic shifts due to sustained accommodation.
Conclusions:
- Consistent and correct use of hyperopic spectacles promotes accommodative relaxation in children.
- Spectacle compliance is a critical factor influencing refractive outcomes and accommodative behavior in pediatric hyperopia.
Purpose:
To indicate the relationship between constant, correct use of hyperopic spectacles and relaxation of accommodation in children.
Methods:
After thorough ophthalmic examination (cycloplegia included), 52 children 2.5 to 9 years old were detected with hyperopia >3 D, out of all examined within a year. These children were fully or partially corrected, with hyperopic glasses, depending on whether accommodative esotropia was or was not present. Constant and correct use of spectacles was strongly suggested to all children. During follow-up 3 and 6 months later, the amount of manifest hyperopia was measured in each case by an autorefractometer (without the use of cycloplegic factor).
Results:
Out of the 52 children, 37 who participated in our study fully complied with hyperopic spectacle treatment, wearing their glasses constantly and correctly. The 15 others wore their glasses partially or not at all or made incorrect use of them. During follow-up 3 and 6 months later, refractive measurements of manifest hyperopia in the first group of children were identical or similar to the refractive power of their glasses. On the contrary, in the second group of children, strong accommodation did not allow the expression of hyperopia, and in a few cases myopic refractive measurements appeared (similar to those on the first examination, before spectacle treatment was prescribed).
Conclusions:
Constant and correct use of hyperopic spectacles leads to relaxation of accommodation in children and is thus an accurate indicator of compliance.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
