Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Surgeon-specific performance reports in general surgery: an observational study of initial implementation and
Stephanie G Yi1, Nelda P Wray, Stephen L Jones
1Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|July 3, 2013
Summary
Surgeon-specific reporting (SSR) shows potential for improving surgical practice. However, clear guidelines are needed for surgeons to understand performance metrics and overcome barriers for effective implementation.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Quality Improvement
- Healthcare Performance Measurement
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- National quality initiatives are increasing demands for individual physician data.
- A surgeon-specific reporting (SSR) program was established to evaluate personal knowledge on individual performance quality.
- The study aimed to assess SSR as a tool for surgeons to evaluate and enhance clinical performance and identify usage barriers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of surgeon-specific reports (SSRs) in enabling surgeons to assess and improve their clinical performance.
- To identify barriers hindering the effective use of SSRs by surgeons.
- To inform the development of future SSR programs.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative research design utilizing semistructured interviews with surgeons who received performance reports.
- Data sources included National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) core measures, alongside hospital administrative data.
- Interview transcripts were analyzed using the constant comparative method.
Main Results:
- 61.5% of surgeons receiving SSRs were interviewed; approximately half understood the data's validity, accuracy, or complexity.
- Of those comprehending the data, 6 took steps to validate data or improve performance.
- Surgeons perceived SSRs could drive improvement via outcome knowledge and peer comparison but noted limitations like small sample sizes, coding errors, and potential for misinterpretation or patient selection bias.
Conclusions:
- Surgeon-specific reporting holds potential for empowering surgeons to enhance their practice.
- Efficient guidelines are necessary for surgeons to effectively understand and utilize performance metrics.
- Findings offer insights for developing more effective SSR programs, with future research needed to confirm outcome improvements.
